Laurence Fox launches political party

He was talking about age not class. I put on iPlayer and am watching it now.

He said older peoples lives are less valuable because they have less left to live.

Yeah but this isn't Logans Run.

For exame I could personally think my 45yrs have been a good run and if the choice was me dying from covid or an18yr old with years ahead then I am fine dying, which was what he was saying

Basically his stance that the older you are the means you have had a good run so in a choice where saving a life the young should live before old.

However having that view is different to thinking it should be a social norm as he was.


His mindset does come from a position of privelidge tbf
 
bet he wasn't volunteering given his age? His life is of more value that that of your granddad unless your granddad is the DoE

I assume he was including himself in that, he didn't propose we should directly let people die. It was in the context of a debate on the merits and effectiveness of lockdown.
 
I assume he was including himself in that, he didn't propose we should directly let people die. It was in the context of a debate on the merits and effectiveness of lockdown.

Yes and his positon as I took it was lockdown affects the younger more so if sacrificing the elderly brings an end to locldown then it is a thing worth doing because he didn't mind it happening to him.

A lord having had a good comfortable life, really didn't understand how such an idea is disagreeable to many.
 
Yes and his positon as I took it was lockdown affects the younger more so if sacrificing the elderly brings an end to locldown then it is a thing worth doing because he didn't mind it happening to him.

A lord having had a good comfortable life, really didn't understand how such an idea is disagreeable to many.

He is a lord because he was a supreme court judge. He admitted he views his grandchildren's lives and (presumably their peer group) as more valuable than his own.
 
He is a lord because he was a supreme court judge. He admitted he views his grandchildren's lives and (presumably their peer group) as more valuable than his own.
So he wasn’t banging on about eugenics.

He was merely saying he values the lives of his younger family, more than his own.

What we’ve just witnessed is everything wrong with the Internet. It doesn’t matter which side of the argument is doing it, we shouldn’t be purposefully taking comments out of context and pushing false narrative around what’s being said.
 
So he wasn’t banging on about eugenics.

He was merely saying he values the lives of his younger family, more than his own.

What we’ve just witnessed is everything wrong with the Internet. It doesn’t matter which side of the argument is doing it, we shouldn’t be purposefully taking comments out of context and pushing false narrative around what’s being said.

No he said it as abroad statement that should apply across society not just his sutuation.

His peraonal opinon on him is fine, thinking it should be standard was what people were concerned at
He followed up when another guest questioned if her life was less because she had canver and he clarified some peoples lives (meaning older people) are less valuablein a generic sense.
 
No he said it as abroad statement that should apply across society not just his sutuation.

His peraonal opinon on him is fine, thinking it should be standard was what people were concerned at
He followed up when another guest questioned if her life was less because she had canver and he clarified some peoples lives (meaning older people) are less valuablein a generic sense.
Well I do not agree with him, a life is a life, no matter age, sex, nationality, ethnicity etc.

However, it appears his point is a general one that the old should make way for the young if needed and he himself is happy to do that.

It’s not “eugenics” as the Tweeter stated.
 
Well I do not agree with him, a life is a life, no matter age, sex, nationality, ethnicity etc.

However, it appears his point is a general one that the old should make way for the young if needed and he himself is happy to do that.

It’s not “eugenics” as the Tweeter stated.

It was me who called it eugenics rather than facist as the tweeter staed.

Eugenic philosophy advocates euthanasia for varied groups including the elderly.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.