League Cup Final - Hart or Pantilimon?

Pantilimon.
Simply because he's earned the right to be there. Nothing to do with sympathy. It's about respect for our players. I'm sure Joe will understand that.
And because I trust him, I trust both our keepers. I think Pants was steady as a rock against Chelsea.
Without for one moment being complacent or disrespecting Sunderland if our players go out in the right frame of mind and perform to their potential our keeper should not be too busy.
 
Hart for sure.

He's our number one, no room for sentiment. Has to be full strength. And for those saying Pants should be chosen as first choice for this for game on merit, i dont think i've seen one person put pants in the line up tomorrow in the match day thread for Stoke
 
comeonfeedthegoat said:
Hart for sure.

He's our number one, no room for sentiment. Has to be full strength. And for those saying Pants should be chosen as first choice for this for game on merit, i dont think i've seen one person put pants in the line up tomorrow in the match day thread for Stoke

Nail bang on head.
 
Judge Roughneck said:
Pantilimon.
Simply because he's earned the right to be there. Nothing to do with sympathy. It's about respect for our players. I'm sure Joe will understand that.
And because I trust him, I trust both our keepers. I think Pants was steady as a rock against Chelsea.
Without for one moment being complacent or disrespecting Sunderland if our players go out in the right frame of mind and perform to their potential our keeper should not be too busy.

Spot on
 
Balti said:
Judge Roughneck said:
Pantilimon.
Simply because he's earned the right to be there. Nothing to do with sympathy. It's about respect for our players. I'm sure Joe will understand that.
And because I trust him, I trust both our keepers. I think Pants was steady as a rock against Chelsea.
Without for one moment being complacent or disrespecting Sunderland if our players go out in the right frame of mind and perform to their potential our keeper should not be too busy.

Spot on
Boyata at right back then?
 
Gaylord du Bois said:
Balti said:
Judge Roughneck said:
Pantilimon.
Simply because he's earned the right to be there. Nothing to do with sympathy. It's about respect for our players. I'm sure Joe will understand that.
And because I trust him, I trust both our keepers. I think Pants was steady as a rock against Chelsea.
Without for one moment being complacent or disrespecting Sunderland if our players go out in the right frame of mind and perform to their potential our keeper should not be too busy.

Spot on
Boyata at right back then?

Pants - sentiment relating to last season as well for me

I don't see that playing Pants would weaken us but playing Boyata probably would do imo if I'm honest
 
Balti said:
Gaylord du Bois said:
Balti said:
Boyata at right back then?

Pants - sentiment relating to last season as well for me

I don't see that playing Pants would weaken us but playing Boyata probably would do imo if I'm honest
I'm stretching the balloon mate. I'd be happy with either for this one.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.