Yet the fee reported by six journalists last week, as hinted on here by reliable people on here, is around 30-40m. So either Brighton are getting a good deal with City in regard to % and loans, or there's a clause, sure.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Left Back
- Thread starter Seth MCFC
- Start date
handsofstone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Aug 2018
- Messages
- 1,514
Don't think Brighton fans would accept them letting go of someone who's just won their player of the season and has 4 years left in his contract go for only £30mil
At that price it's a steal, but like Phillips, unless there is a release clause I see these values (for both) being much closer to £50mil which imo is too much for either
At that price it's a steal, but like Phillips, unless there is a release clause I see these values (for both) being much closer to £50mil which imo is too much for either
ONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN
Well-Known Member
Can see money plus loans of decent players as a sweetnerDon't think Brighton fans would accept them letting go of someone who's just won their player of the season and has 4 years left in his contract go for only £30mil
At that price it's a steal, but like Phillips, unless there is a release clause I see these values (for both) being much closer to £50mil which imo is too much for either
handsofstone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Aug 2018
- Messages
- 1,514
Genuine question, but has that ever been doneCan see money plus loans of decent players as a sweetner
Hear it floated around but never actually seen it
Why would Brighton take significantly less money AND develop a player (assuming its a younger guy they'd be given) for us that they likely couldn't sign
ONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN
Well-Known Member
Not sure if done before but having a good relationship with club with best academy surely counts for somethingGenuine question, but has that ever been done
Hear it floated around but never actually seen it
Why would Brighton take significantly less money AND develop a player (assuming its a younger guy they'd be given) for us that they likely couldn't sign
Brighton would also receive double what they paid for him
Well there is nothing that suggests that the fee will be over 40m, as reported. More evidence point towards a clause or a fee by going on ITKs word and reports.Don't think Brighton fans would accept them letting go of someone who's just won their player of the season and has 4 years left in his contract go for only £30mil
At that price it's a steal, but like Phillips, unless there is a release clause I see these values (for both) being much closer to £50mil which imo is too much for either
He has just come off the back of an excellent season and the chance of more than doubling their 15M investment must be tempting.Don't think Brighton fans would accept them letting go of someone who's just won their player of the season and has 4 years left in his contract go for only £30mil
At that price it's a steal, but like Phillips, unless there is a release clause I see these values (for both) being much closer to £50mil which imo is too much for either
The player will probably earn double/treble his present wages if he arrives here.
He's also JUST openly said he wouldnt say no to a top club and that brighton was a stepping stone... they'll probably sell now when the stocks are high.He has just come off the back of an excellent season and the chance of more than doubling their 15M investment must be tempting.
The player will probably earn double/treble his present wages if he arrives here.
Don't think Brighton fans would accept them letting go of someone who's just won their player of the season and has 4 years left in his contract go for only £30mil
At that price it's a steal, but like Phillips, unless there is a release clause I see these values (for both) being much closer to £50mil which imo is too much for either
Not their call