Anyone who thought they should have a penalty is either deluded, a rag / dipper, doesn’t understand the game or a combination of the three.
@SebastianBlue
What does double 0 get you from that?
Had Aguero for fgs and also fgs and City win so you can imagine we’re not speaking currently.
I don’t understand why Kev doesn’t take penalties. Best striker of the ball we have. That’s a start.A good game, City deserved the win. We’re still not at our best, but the clean sheet is good, although Vardy should have scored. Interesting watching on Bein sports, Wenger said Kun would have been declared onside next season, with the proposed amendment. He also said Collina agrees with it. We need to look at penalties, the last 4 in the league missed; and by FOUR different takers. That is the problem.
Stop what and why the insultStop it you bell end.
in English please@SebastianBlue
What does double 0 get you from that?
Had Aguero for fgs and also fgs and City win so you can imagine we’re not speaking currently.
It wasn’t the free kick that directly hit de Bruyne’s arms, the ball hit de Bruyne from a deflection off Laporte from a yard away from him.
Whereas that Praett’s hit his arms directly from the shot.
I think that’s where the difference was and why they ended up as different decisions.
It doesn't say much for our club when supporters are begging for the fucking goalie to take penalties because they don't trust TEN outfield players to take them.
Bring Franny out of retirement.
That’s where I think the difference in the decision making will have been made, yes.Do you actually believe this???
No issue being partisan, it’s a Man City forum, but You all hate the injustice against you from perceived bigger clubs, so would have expected more empathy.