You can rest assured that if one of our players is cynically or recklessly tripped/hacked from behind I'll see it as a yellow, especially if it's in a nothing part of the pitch.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Leroy Sane - 2018/2019 performances
- Thread starter mac
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
You can rest assured that if one of our players is cynically or recklessly tripped/hacked from behind I'll see it as a yellow, especially if it's in a nothing part of the pitch.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
LMFAO - and you think you are in the majorityYou can rest assured that if one of our players is cynically or recklessly tripped/hacked from behind I'll see it as a yellow, especially if it's in a nothing part of the pitch.
Anyway keep responding to others as I want to see how deep you can dig this hole
LMFAO - and you think you are in the majority
Anyway keep responding to others as I want to see how deep you can dig this hole
No hole. The laws of the game fully vindicated my position.
A simple question was asked of you, you've repeatedly failed to answer. You resorted to a few cheap shots.
It was a yellow card by the very definition.
"commits in a reckless manner a direct free kick offence".
Let's not confused the inconsistency of officiating for what's 'normal.' We've seen less dangerous tackles given a red as well. So the existence of worse tackles that didn't get a red is not proof this shouldn't have been.I hear ya, but you must understand that we clearly know there's an acceptable level of physicality in the premier league and this falls within that. There's no point saying it should be a red when week in week out we see far worse tackles go unpunished.
This tackle, like many others we often whine about when against our players, falls within the group of tackles that incorrectly didn't get penalized.
Yes!! It the definition of it. "Savage physical violence, and cruelty."Sorry, you're saying it's "brutality".
I don't believe you.
Does anyone have a gif of it. Or is it better we have less evidence of it? I certainly I'm not too interested in seeing it again. But for the sake of clarity in discussion, perhaps we should :(
Let's not confused the inconsistency of officiating for what's 'normal.' We've seen less dangerous tackles gotten a red as well. So the existence of worse tackles that didn't get a red is not proof this shouldn't have been.
This tackle, like many others we often whine about when against our players, falls within the group of tacllta that inxorrectly didn't get penalized.
Yes!! It the definition of it. "Savage physical violence, and cruelty."
Does anyone have a gif of it. Or is it better we have less evidence of it? I certainly I'm not too interested in seeing it again. But for the sake of clarity in discussion, perhaps we should :(
It really isn't brutality. It's reckless & petulant.
Brutality is a ridiculous description of the incident.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
I have answered several times, your problem is that you didn't like the answer.No hole. The laws of the game fully vindicated my position.
A simple question was asked of you, you've repeatedly failed to answer. You resorted to a few cheap shots.
It was a yellow card by the very definition.
"commits in a reckless manner a direct free kick offence".
FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,697
Turn it in guys,you obviously cant agree and its becoming very boring as a result.
I have answered several times, your problem is that you didn't like the answer.
You offered reckless, a yellow card offence.
It really isn't brutality. It's reckless & petulant.
Brutality is a ridiculous description of the incident.
Was it violent? Yes. Was it cruel? Yes. Was it physical? Yes. Those are the requirements for Brutality. It was all 3. It was also premeditated. And his intent was to harm the other player.
Nothing about what Sane did in that sequence, outside the bluewashing been done here by a few, is within bounds.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.