Now I am not a person to bash our own players - they have my wholehearted support. That's not what this thread is about.
What this is about is that Lescott is not a left-back, and yesterday's game proved it. He was reluctant to run into space infront of him - opting for simple passes instead; failed to make any good crosses; drifted way too much inward in defensive situations.
He's a centre back, and I think we would've been more dangerous and solid had we had the young lad Cunningham starting instead.
It's a big ask for him to be picked against Liverpool, but at least I would rather have a fullback (i.e. Zabaleta) there instead of Lescott. And definitely play him for the home leg.
Do people after yesterday still think that Lescott could do us a job at left back?
What this is about is that Lescott is not a left-back, and yesterday's game proved it. He was reluctant to run into space infront of him - opting for simple passes instead; failed to make any good crosses; drifted way too much inward in defensive situations.
He's a centre back, and I think we would've been more dangerous and solid had we had the young lad Cunningham starting instead.
It's a big ask for him to be picked against Liverpool, but at least I would rather have a fullback (i.e. Zabaleta) there instead of Lescott. And definitely play him for the home leg.
Do people after yesterday still think that Lescott could do us a job at left back?