Let the bodies pile high.

[leithblue]

Very Tory what the fuck you on about you turd,we ended up taking my lads mate in because he was sleeping on a park bench,his **** of a mother and father couldn’t give a shit.

So you’re saying that vulnerable children should be cared for by the off chance of acquaintances taking them in and not the government?

 

[East Level 2]

Johnson is alleged to have said he didn't care as "it's only the over 80s dying".
Stanley Johnson has just turned 81.
What does the scruffy buffoon hope to inherit?

 

[everythingchangesbutblue]

It's the Johnson way and it was the Trump way to have those least fortunate in life to blame each other for their status than the richest 1%. Keep them fighting amongst each other while billionaires pay no tax.

"Look at that lazy person/immigrant/drug addict/benefit scrounger" "You would be better off if it were not for them" "My opponents want to give them hugs and free houses right next door to you"

Keeps people looking down or sideways rather than up.

 

[Ifwecouldjust.......]

I see that the BBC are running with the ''Immigrants Problem'' rather than Cummings interview.


Tory mouthpiece

 

[EL APACHE TEVEZ]

So you’re saying that vulnerable children should be cared for by the off chance of acquaintances taking them in and not the government?

Errrr No,but what I am saying is,the parents should be held accountable for neglect of their child/Children ,take it your one of them who havnt seen this first hand.

 

[The Future’s Blue!]

For me, their whole attitude towards us is in the book 'Britannia Unchained', so it's absolutely no surprise the new tory way of treating the pandemic is to absolve themselves of all responsibility by laying the emphasis on us to behave ourselves.

I watched the interview tonight with Dominic Cummings, and it didn't reveal anything surprising about Boris. One or two details were new, and him smirking about brexit angered me, but he was being honest, and as he said, nothing he has stated won't be corroborated in the enquiry. He added they would be under oath, and while I'm not sure Tory politicians will be too worried about that, other honest people that aren't tory party members that have their moral compass in the correct place that heard it probably will tell the truth about 'let the bodies pile up'.

I laughed my head off at him stating Michael Gove was absolutely honest, so I didn't agree with everything he said, but I don't dispute for one second our Prime Minister couldn't give a stuff about the elderly dying. It reinforced a perception that our lockdowns happened too late, we didn't close our borders and isolate enough, and our death rates from the disease being amongst the worst in the world are principally because the government didn't really give a shit about it.

A government that has the best interests of its people at heart doesn't let infected elderly patients be discharged from hospital and moved into care homes.

Many have said that if you wanted a way to get rid of the costs associated with the elderly and vulnerable, then just allow COVID to spread through the population.

That‘s literally what we’ve done.

 

[carlosthejackal]

Errrr No,but what I am saying is,the parents should be held accountable for neglect of their child/Children ,take it your one of them who havnt seen this first hand.

In an ideal world correct but what sanctions do you propose for the parents ? No matter what is proposed the burden of care for the children will be placed on the state , sadly some of these parents are beyond help .

 

[Ifwecouldjust.......]

Errrr No,but what I am saying is,the parents should be held accountable for neglect of their child/Children ,take it your one of them who havnt seen this first hand.

Agreed... but some parents cant even look after themselves let alone their kids. We don't have any support systems in place and social services have been cut to the bone.

To let the kids go hungry (its not their fault) is not the solution to getting the parents to sort out their lives. (and if you knew any alcoholics / drug addicts you'll know many of them are a lost cause without professional help)

 

[leithblue]

Errrr No,but what I am saying is,the parents should be held accountable for neglect of their child/Children ,take it your one of them who havnt seen this first hand.

No my wife is school guidance so we see a lot of it. To be honest she/we fund the school’s programme to provide girls with sanitary products when they can’t

I’m just very confused by your position, your reaction to a statement that the public should be appalled by a government that voted against making provisions to feed children in poverty is that some kids parents are addicts. Why should that affect whether we care for all vulnerable kids?
I don’t get how you look at 98 kids and say “sorry, we’d love to feed you, but the parents of those 2 kids over there are addicts so afraid we’ll not bother”. Then say parents should be held accountable - fine - but why should that make any difference to doing everything to ensure their kids aren’t starving, never mind anything else?

 

[Citizen of Legoland]

Many have said that if you wanted a way to get rid of the costs associated with the elderly and vulnerable, then just allow COVID to spread through the population.

That‘s literally what we’ve done.

Apart from prioritising the vaccinations to the clinically vulnerable and highest ages downwards but carry on ...