supercity88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 13,915
I don’t think much of Masters as an executive, but he isn’t the only person involved, and if you think the decision not to attend our match and present the medals/trophy to the likely champions was completely down to him, I think you are misreading the current dynamics, both related to the charges and the direction of the league more broadly.
As I said, you're looking into it in far too much detail. The US ownership and threat that serves is a different matter entirely. This was a case of Masters wanting to hide from us and choosing the Arsenal game instead - they could have won it so he could have been in the right place.
Once these charges are dealt with there's no more concern over that particular matter. We know what the Americans want. They want a league that they can monopolise for the minimum investment. A closed league, no promotion or relegation so their position is safe, a spending cap so they don't have to invest too much and more and more profits thanks to games in New York, Rio and Sydney every season. A footballing NFL.
But the fans will block it. Whatever rules they can get the majority vote on we'll still back ourselves to be the best.