But we don’t know how many potential sponsors are lurking in the background. We don’t just rely on Abu Dhabi based sponsors for our commercial income and I’m sure we’d be even less reliant on them if Messi signed. I also don’t think that simply comparing the revenues of Barca and Real Madrid debunk the idea that Messi’s commercial appeal is out there on its own. Sure, Ronaldo is very marketable but Messi is in another league altogether IMO.
I have no idea, I would think in terms of the Premier league this is unique?They will be sniffing with or without Messi signing. Why would that make a difference? Is it illegal?
Keep up mate. I think that happened this morning, that’s when I first saw it mentioned.Wait, Aguero has removed the 10? Holy shit
This is old news, he removed 10 from his insta a long time ago.Wait, Aguero has removed the 10? Holy shit
he saidHe has so far failed to remove possibly the worst president in their entire history.
Don't buy into the media bullshit.
It happened days ago.Keep up mate. I think that happened this morning, that’s when I first saw it mentioned.
No I don't subscribe any longer but I disagree with that conclusion and suspect it is not including the likely spending this Summer (Koulibaly etc) and you can't look in one year view anyway.Did you read the article in the athletic? Explains it pretty well. Right now were roughly 100-140m in FFP profit.
how many times has he played against great premier league teams? A lot.
he’ll be fine
So Puma is £65m per year.As for our reliance on Abu Dhabi partners, it is something like 80% from memory - the vast majority.
Don't forget your tattoo mate.It’s done. Messi’s dad only follows two footballers on Instagram - Messi and Aguero. He must have followed Aguero to privately message him and ask him to remove the 10 from his name.
I’m off to get my number 10 Messi full kit.