However good he is, I don't think we should be paying 50m plus for 12 months.It would be a very good deal for Barca, if we paid them 50 million quid, then took his wages off their books.
The alternative is a prisoner Messi, signing a pre contract deal with City in the winter window & then moving for free at the end of the season, after costng them 1 million quid a week.
Do they really want to just keep him there as a mascot ?
Would we want that at City, if it was the other way around ?
What use to Barca is a demotivated Messi ?
How would you translate it? I think Google Translate doesn't capture local nuance.This is an inaccurate translation - always go straight to the source
MillsyTheMosher has taken some time off this and the Quiet thread.
Can’t it be both?I tried an "arm round" approach with him earlier but he's either the most highly strung person in the world or a wum.
My Spanish is no bueno. Help us out pal.
However good he is, I don't think we should be paying 50m plus for 12 months.
He signs for 2 years with us and them possibly off to NYCFC and the MLS great.
But 12 months, not for me.
to be fair, this is exactly what tolmie said... barca weren't negotiating.Think maybe Barca have just said Messi won't leave unless the release clause is paid
Who said he's decided to stay? Or is it your wishful thinking?