oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Ah I didn`t hear that.Thanks Burton.Apparently so.
Was mentioned in the commentary last night.
Ah I didn`t hear that.Thanks Burton.Apparently so.
Was mentioned in the commentary last night.
love it hahahaha and the pep in the city song hahahahah
Yes she died on January 19th and was 81 years old, because of travel restrictions inposed by Germany Klopp coukd not attend this weeks funeral. My sympathy goes out to him.Serious question as I`ve not seen anything on here ... but has Klopps mother ,Elisabeth passed away.
Serious q not a piss take !!
One of the most obvious misuses of the laws is in the interpretation of a 'clear and obvious error' by the referee.
Take two recent cases. Salah's penalty - immediate decision made by the referee, it was a penalty. The incident is then reviewed by the VAR. Dias did make contact with Salah, but was it enough to cause him to fall? Maybe, just. But even if he made the most of it, there isn't enough there to say the referee made a clear and obvious error, so the penalty stands.
Jesus against Burnley, when he was kicked on his ankle by the defender. No penalty given, play continues. VAR looks at replays whilst play is ongoing. There was a kick, but maybe the referee saw it and decided it's just not enough to deserve a penalty. Therefore it is not a clear and obvious error, so the original decision stands.
So whilst VAR was introduced to make things fairer for everyone, it obvious that it can be manipulated to benefit or disadvantage certain teams. And the likes of Walton, in the studio, just back up the referee with their original decision. They know that they can never be wrong, because what was designed to create a level playing field, is suddenly a victim of subjectivity. It's all about opinions!
We see in a 50/50 situation, with one team winning comfortably against opponents reduced to ten men, send off the player to send them down to nine men. Don't even think of giving the benefit of the doubt to the team that is already six goals and one player down. Oh, and when the decision is eventually found to be wrong, don't think about punishing the attacker for deceiving the referee. Other instances of subtle corruption ad infinitum.
Yeah, you can do that, but we surely were talking about the goalkeeper himself going upfield to take a penalty. It happens occasionally, and if he misses, he just had to leg it back to get back in goal, and hope the opposition don't get the ball past him.You can swap keeper with outfield player as long as it is during a stoppage. So in this instance, you would tell the ref Ederson is coming out of goal & Walker is going in. They would have to change shirts obviously. Once Ederson scores you tell the ref that they are swapping back or if Ederson misses/saved at next stoppage.
Can do it either wayYeah, you can do that, but we surely were talking about the goalkeeper himself going upfield to take a penalty. It happens occasionally, and if he misses, he just had to leg it back to get back in goal, and hope the opposition don't get the ball past him.
Yeah, you can do that, but we surely were talking about the goalkeeper himself going upfield to take a penalty. It happens occasionally, and if he misses, he just had to leg it back to get back in goal, and hope the opposition don't get the ball past him.
picture ederson hitting the ball very hard for a pen... The issue would be if he hits the bar or the post
Brilliant picture. Thanks.
That's a brilliant picture. Thanks.
Put someone else in goal while he takes it.Yeah, you can do that, but we surely were talking about the goalkeeper himself going upfield to take a penalty. It happens occasionally, and if he misses, he just had to leg it back to get back in goal, and hope the opposition don't get the ball past him.
Yes, and the decision that the ref should make is "there's no way in the fucking world that's a fucking penalty you diving cheat".Just re watched the incident. Not changed my mind. Dias defo pulls him back. Yes,it is slight but by Dias doing this he gives the ref a decision to make.
Some teams do well with yellow cards in that they get a finger wgged when others are actually on the receiving end. Yer right, shev - no difference in the fouls, apart from the fact that Dias didn't, and Fabinho would have had a one-matcher, which he gets away with!Has anyone seen the incidents for us again, that weren't given?
Foden not getting a pen on the cross, looked like something that would at least be looked at by VAR but they never even mentioned it AFAIK. Then the Stones offside, probably was offside but where the fuck were the lines? Was it that obvious that they weren't even needed? Dias got a yellow for "pulling" Salah, but Fabinho didn't get one for purposefully putting his leg out to try and stop Sterling, he got a yellow later on Foden so that would've been a red.
Phil looks like hes expecting to see a flag up or VAR check incoming. Pity the ground was empty.Brilliant picture. Thanks.
Only just stumbled across this, so I may well be late to the party.....
You've got to love Nige,haven't you?
She did yeah, all the sympathy in the world for the lad, I know from experience how hard it is to lose somebody now when you can't even go to the funeral.Serious question as I`ve not seen anything on here ... but has Klopps mother ,Elisabeth passed away.
Serious q not a piss take !!