Liverpool (A) Post Match Thread

I'm convinced VAR doesn't work at Anfield we play them.

Didn't see it once last week with some questionable decisions.

Wasn't used last season as well when Salah scored that goal which again, looked questionably offside.
Wasnt questionable bud - you could see with the naked eye if you freeze frame. Funnily enough, still seen no replay of Stones's apparently offside goal
 
If dias had fallen over after the initially pull by the Egyptian diver do you think a foul would have been against him . I very much doubt it.

Completely agree, but what the ref would have given in the heat of the moment and what VAR is able to see with the benefit of a replay from a different angle are two different things. The initial pull and shirt grab by Salah would not have been seen by the ref.

There is no doubt that what should happen in an ideal world where no mistakes are ever made and what actually happens on the pitch are two different things. But that doesn't mean that the penalty was correctly awarded.

It also highlights the ease with which some decisions are given for some teams even when incorrect. If Sterling had gone down like Salah did, do you think he would have got a penalty?
 
Salah gets beyond Dias and holds out an arm to fend him off. The arm that is fending Dias off (he grabs Dias' shirt briefly, too) is the very arm that Dias then grabs hold of. How on earth can that be "outside the context of the main event"? It happens within the self-same passage of play.
Amend that to the arm that Dias pushes down. He didn’t grab hold of.
As others have said, there is all in wrestling at corners. I saw nothing excessive from Dias as regards manhandling.

The argument that you see them given is exactly what is ruining the game and turning many off.
 
I really can't see any point in continuing to piss and moan about the penalty. It was given against us so people are unhappy. If it had been given for us the same people would have unanimously called it as a penalty. That's the pantomime nature of being a partisan football fan. Who gives a fuck? The fact that they thought they'd sneaked their way back in it made the subsequent demolishment all the sweeter.
The point is when will the powers that be start punishing CHEATS like SALAH?
 
I really can't see any point in continuing to piss and moan about the penalty. It was given against us so people are unhappy. If it had been given for us the same people would have unanimously called it as a penalty. That's the pantomime nature of being a partisan football fan. Who gives a fuck? The fact that they thought they'd sneaked their way back in it made the subsequent demolishment all the sweeter.

For me it's worth discussing because it's part of a wider argument. The wider argument is 'it was a foul, so a penalty was the right decision, but if player X hadn't gone down like he'd been shot he wouldn't have got the decision. So that justifies the swan dive because it's the only way he gets the penalty he should get anyway.'

I can understand that argument, even if I'm not sure I agree with it. But whilst that may or may not be generally acceptable, outright cheating is not. On Sunday Salah threw himself on the floor following a contact that he had initiated. That is cheating. I have seen many blues say 'yes it was a penalty' and it isn't moaning to ask someone to justify that. There's no more point in saying 'it was a penalty' than there is in saying 'it wasn't'. It was given, they scored it, we gave them a fucking good hiding anyway.

But there is a difference between a player - arguably like Sterling in the first half - who got fouled and made no attempt to stay on his feet and a player who dives. This is a player who didn't make the most of a foul, he dived after first pushing Dias. That's cheating, and it isn't moaning to point that out.

But it might be nitpicking ;)
 
They probably will at some point because loads of players are doing it. One touch and they go down. I don't like it but it isn't exclusive to Salah and it's not worth dwelling on after that sweet victory.
I agree, and the diving has become more prevalent. The refs are so poor, they get sucked in and give the decision, with red teams definitely getting the calls. I can’t remember the last time a card was issued for blatant diving, yet it seems to be happening in almost every match.
 
Having read the opinions of fellow Blues about the Salad issue I would be surprised if there's a change for the better vis: him getting away with his theatrics. If anything, I fear that it may get worse as the PL & PGMOL will surely be getting concerned with the dippers' decline. Expect even more dodgy decisions in the weeks to come as they try to help them back up the league.
Personally I couldn't give a fcuk as they're not gonna catch us and the rest of the football world can clearly see what's going on. All the assistance they get isn't much use when the opposition makes it mission impossible by playing better football and scoring goals that not even the most bent of referees can disallow.

TBH, in the Shankly/Paisley era I actually admired them and indeed enjoyed watching them play. Nowadays they've sunk to new depths of cheating, self-entitlement & whingeing. No wonder nobody likes them. It takes some sort of genius to put together a group of players which so perfectly fits into the cult ideology of the club, it's manager & it's fans. Klopp has played a blinder in that respect.
 
I remember "Trent" handling blatantly last season and we never saw any VAR intervention.... We're still waiting for the VAR films of Stones's offside goal on Sunday. Still Liverpool are entitled to favourable treatment - "it means more."

I watched it on a moody foreign stream and it replayed the disallowed Stones goal several times and he was definitely onside mate.
 
Salah has been doing this for years, rehearsed and accomplished . When var was introduced it was touted as the end of this sort of deliberate cheating....that went well. The technology isn't perfect but the implimenting of it is the real disaster. if the players knew they would be penalised for the simulation it would be drastically reduced, dont hold your breath.
 
Having read the opinions of fellow Blues about the Salad issue I would be surprised if there's a change for the better vis: him getting away with his theatrics. If anything, I fear that it may get worse as the PL & PGMOL will surely be getting concerned with the dippers' decline. Expect even more dodgy decisions in the weeks to come as they try to help them back up the league.
Personally I couldn't give a fcuk as they're not gonna catch us and the rest of the football world can clearly see what's going on. All the assistance they get isn't much use when the opposition makes it mission impossible by playing better football and scoring goals that not even the most bent of referees can disallow.

TBH, in the Shankly/Paisley era I actually admired them and indeed enjoyed watching them play. Nowadays they've sunk to new depths of cheating, self-entitlement & whingeing. No wonder nobody likes them. It takes some sort of genius to put together a group of players which so perfectly fits into the cult ideology of the club, it's manager & it's fans. Klopp has played a blinder in that respect.
The dippers' return to their natural level.
 
Eddy won’t miss. He will either score or break the opposing goalie it he gets in the way.
Only risk is that if he hits the bar it could rebound into our net.
#Edersonforpenalties

I would say most blues are worried about the rebound going into our own net.
Me included.
#dontoverpingiteddie
 
I would say most blues are worried about the rebound going into our own net.
Me included.
#dontoverpingiteddie
I believe you’re allowed to nominate a temporary goalkeeper in these events as long as you inform the officials at the time.
Kyle Walker wouldn’t be a bad choice.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top