There were lots of images of that, so not much doubt Liverpool fans were involved. I didn't really expect them to apologise though as the club cannot be in control of, or responsible for, what fans do outside the stadium.No one seemed to raise the possibility it could have been a Everton fan or general scrote that damaged the City bus last time.
I don't really understand how the same people who thought it was scumbag behaviour for Liverpool to not apologise when City's property was damaged now think City shouldn't have apologised when the reverse happens.
What damage? I haven't seen anyEh up big man. Who popped 50 pence in you?
I don't need proof. Whether it was a City fan or not - although it clearly was a City fan (let's us not start claiming it 'wasn't our fault') - the fact is the Liverpool bus was damaged at City. It will be portrayed as an attack by a City fan. I get some people can't have anything negative said about anything to do with City but we can't call the scousers scrotes and ridicule them for saying it's never their fault and then do the same things.
Instead of being dead hard and angry telling me to f' off, you should be telling the moron that showed us up to do one pal.
There were lots of images of that, so not much doubt Liverpool fans were involved. I didn't really expect them to apologise though as the club cannot be in control what fans do outside the stadium.
If we sing the chicken song at Klanfield they'll be offended.
With a little Jibbing here
And a little Jibbing there
Then we throw a slab at a local
We play the victim here
We play the victim there
And then we claim for the compo
What incident on Saturday ?No one did compare those two incidents.
Have you all completely forgotten the last time the City bus got damaged? It was 6 months ago. There was no baying mob, there was no 10's of thousands of pounds of damage, there was one damaged window from something the club reported happened on their way home from Anfield and noticed the morning after.
That's the incident comparable to Saturday, and City took the moral high ground by condemning it. They didn't apologise. They didn't blame City fans, they said "throwing stuff at coaches is bad".
It's fucking peverse that anyone thinks that's the wrong thing to do. It's also completely ridiculous to say it happened "in the middle of Manchester" when it's about 50 feet from the stadium.
Some of you are just desperate to attack the club for doing anything, even when it's clearly the right thing.
The only reports of this incident on the World Wide Web are in relation to City's apology. They clearly state an object was thrown but did not hit the bus. I cannot find any mention of criminal damage, just that the police have opened an investigation.Ok we're doing more bizarro bullshit are we?
The incident where something was thrown at the Liverpool bus.
City didn't apoligise.
Yes it did, obviously, because GMP have opened an investigation after a report was filed of criminal damage.
Something thrown at a bus can't damage it without hitting it.
Why are you tying yourself up in knots over this? We don't like people throwing stuff at buses. It should be condemned when it happens to City fans or team, and it should be condemned when it happens to visiting teams or fans a stones throw (intended) from the Etihad.
"Conservative MP and editor of The Spectator Boris Johnson was criticised last year after commenting in the magazine that Liverpudlians were "hooked on grief"."How fucking dare you, that was another tragedy…
The only reports of this incident on the World Wide Web are in relation to City's apology. They clearly state an object was thrown but did not hit the bus. I cannot find any mention of criminal damage, just that the police have opened an investigation.
We've had City fans stating it was brick without any facts to back that up.
I say again, point me in the direction of a report, separate to City's apology, that criminal damage was caused to the coach.