Bazzmand Show
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 5,058
Maybe it’s that City are just…better than you?
Lol
"Why do they try against us?!"
Classic....
Maybe it’s that City are just…better than you?
I don't know why they cannot just use the "clear and obvious error" rule. Surely no supporter wants goals ruled out for players being 2mm offside? It's ridiculous.Literally none of this is needed, just draw the line from the feet.....
When VAR came in the rule should have been amended because when it was just linesman there was no way they could make some of the calls that are coming out now - where half a players finger is offside and it just doesn't make sense.
If that's the case no wonder Ringway was so chokka !Some Manchester schools and colleges are on the easter break, expect people have decided a holiday with family is more important than a game.
Which it is, family first unless it's a derby.
Did McNulty reveal the results of his poll?Twats on BBC Sport making out it was an even game. To be expected with McNulty though. Not watched MOTD yet so expecting the same ?
It was funny of Sky to mention a "spate of cynical challenges" only after city fouled once but not after Liverpool had committed 4 in a row.When I got home from the game I was thinking il take that. But then I watched the highlights and we were fucking robbed by the bent twat Taylor. Of course we should have taken our chances. But we literally scored the winner again for it to be chalked off. And if dinho did any of them challenges he'd be off. Leaves a bitter taste as it doesn't happen to other clubs. Still think wel win the league but we're playing against 12 every week now
Jesus body language told me by looking at the linesman after he scored was he was off by checking the linesman first, so that logic doesn’t work.Was Keane and Richards in the sky box so doubt it. Think the feeling amongst most was it was offside, Sterling’s body language in itself told me he thought he was off before they even went to var.