İt said on the news that the site of new ground is currently derelict so what is the fuss about.A new ground is going to look nicer than some old buildings that should have been brought back to life years ago if they were ever going toUNESCO should be insisting on redevelopment. Why keep the docks as a grim memorial to the slave trade and the desolation of Thatcher's Britain?
The 'iconic' bit of the waterfront is surely the liver buildings and the Albert Dock? The rest is a bit meh, and all they (peel holdings I think) are doing to the north dock what was done to Salford Quays.Surely most tourists who would go there go either for A/The Beatles history B/It's football teams C/ stags or hens, I have never heard of anyone going to Liverpool because its UNESCO heritage site
Love how people cannot seperate Liverpool itself from them sock robbin red cunts.
It's like saying everyone in the borough of trafford is a **** because the rags are from there.
To me that sums up the unions. They thought they could run the docks stealing anything and everything as they did and progress, (containers) wouldn't happen because they wouldn't let it. Then those cheeky Chelsea fans opened up a container port darn sarf and the dockers were history.The famous saying at the docks.. 'If there not on pallets there not coming off '
Oh you.UNESCO should be insisting on redevelopment. Why keep the docks as a grim memorial to the slave trade and the desolation of Thatcher's Britain?
Surely most tourists who would go there go either for A/The Beatles history B/It's football teams C/ stags or hens, I have never heard of anyone going to Liverpool because its UNESCO heritage site
Looks better from the river on a Mersey Ferry cruise from Birkenhead.Surely most tourists who would go there go either for A/The Beatles history B/It's football teams C/ stags or hens, I have never heard of anyone going to Liverpool because its UNESCO heritage site