If my revenue was £200m+, sure. It’s a speeding ticket.Would you pay £1m to settle something that means nothing to the other side?
If my revenue was £200m+, sure. It’s a speeding ticket.Would you pay £1m to settle something that means nothing to the other side?
Have they seriously not asked Klopp the same question they asked Pep? It's almost like they are trying to excuse their own double standards, based on what Pep or Man City say about it. Like they need permission off Pep or Man City to go after this story. Since when does that matter, as far as journalism goes? Or so they tell us.Ask yourselves this. If you were caught hacking, which this is, into a competitor’s computer system would your company pay a settlement and promote you or sack you? I think we all know the answer. The media should be all over this and asking questions. We win the treble and Pep is asked if he has taken back handers. Pep was asked about this situation despite him not even being at City then. Has Klipperty been asked anything? Something very fishy about this whole situation and the lack of coverage.
No right minded person wouldI wouldn't pay a speeding ticket if I wasn't speeding.
Again you just make things up, your sentence, and I quote 'but considering it happened six years ago, you can’t really point to any actual harm that it caused'
When we were hacked Liverpool were nothing, where are they now and how did they get there should be the questions you are asking. Did they hack other data bases, were we forced to pay more for Ferny that we could have done if we bought him 12 months later. Stop slagging down this criminal act as though it was nothing. they did it and benefitted from doing it, why is that so hard to understand.