citymike1969
Well-Known Member
Bored at work... had a little trip over to Squawk...
"But the reason is that Liverpool content gets more attention than City content. Even the Godawful Manc Evening News shoehorn the word Liverpool into their headlines."
...its that old devil called self awareness again - anyone who visits the echo site will have noticed that for the past 18 months there's seldom been less than 4 articles mentioning City in the headline on their page.
"Disappointing to hear Souness using the term "cartel". Fuck me, is there anyone City hasn't brainwashed or bought off?"
...difficult to know where to start with this one... even uber-lack of self awareness really doesn't cover it!
"I see it mentioned loads by fans of other clubs about their owners being murderous despots. It’s certainly not just us lot."
... the last line of the only acceptable response to this reads 'pants on fire'!
"I think they're all like that, Chelsea were the same. Everyone knows they're only successful cos their owners have made sure they've outspent everyone else, they should just accept it and say 'yeah, so what?'."
... they love their 'istry'... but by Christ don't anybody dare ask how they paid for that 70s/80s period of dominance
"and the most famous event at their Former home and “historic stadium” was an Oasis gig it’s slim pickings"
...Really?? I can think of loads more... 84,569 in 1934 for instance. That wouldn't come to mind for a couple of reasons though... nearly a century ago, from a club with no history... and what's the record attendance at the ground they acquired after Everton dumped it for being unfit for purpose?
"Klopp could easily drop a line or two into every press conference about City's cheating and watch Pep and that nothing club lose the plot and it would be glorious."
... go on I dare you, I double dare you motherfuckers...
"What a shame. No paid Technicaliteh FC propaganda mouthpieces in here today."
... I've seen one City supporter on that thread, and he got banned within about 3 posts for a fairly innocuous post that mentioned racism in relation to ADUG... compare and contrast to what goes on on BM, and its pretty obvious they don't have the required intellect to deal with any non party line towing visitors, the thin skinned, deluded tossers.
"Whats all this cartel nonsense as well. Surely the Premier league is one of the most open top level leagues there is"
even for Squawk this takes being both deluded and as thick as a great big pile of rocks to hitherto unseen levels... do Bayern play in the PL? do Juventus play in the PL?... Do Real play in the PL?...Do Barca play in the PL? ... Do you understand what role an apostrophe plays in the written form of the English language?...whoops-a-daisy, sorry I forgot for a moment, you're scouse not English... shouldn't criticise you for errors when using a language that isn't your native tongue...
"But the reason is that Liverpool content gets more attention than City content. Even the Godawful Manc Evening News shoehorn the word Liverpool into their headlines."
...its that old devil called self awareness again - anyone who visits the echo site will have noticed that for the past 18 months there's seldom been less than 4 articles mentioning City in the headline on their page.
"Disappointing to hear Souness using the term "cartel". Fuck me, is there anyone City hasn't brainwashed or bought off?"
...difficult to know where to start with this one... even uber-lack of self awareness really doesn't cover it!
"I see it mentioned loads by fans of other clubs about their owners being murderous despots. It’s certainly not just us lot."
... the last line of the only acceptable response to this reads 'pants on fire'!
"I think they're all like that, Chelsea were the same. Everyone knows they're only successful cos their owners have made sure they've outspent everyone else, they should just accept it and say 'yeah, so what?'."
... they love their 'istry'... but by Christ don't anybody dare ask how they paid for that 70s/80s period of dominance
"and the most famous event at their Former home and “historic stadium” was an Oasis gig it’s slim pickings"
...Really?? I can think of loads more... 84,569 in 1934 for instance. That wouldn't come to mind for a couple of reasons though... nearly a century ago, from a club with no history... and what's the record attendance at the ground they acquired after Everton dumped it for being unfit for purpose?
"Klopp could easily drop a line or two into every press conference about City's cheating and watch Pep and that nothing club lose the plot and it would be glorious."
... go on I dare you, I double dare you motherfuckers...
"What a shame. No paid Technicaliteh FC propaganda mouthpieces in here today."
... I've seen one City supporter on that thread, and he got banned within about 3 posts for a fairly innocuous post that mentioned racism in relation to ADUG... compare and contrast to what goes on on BM, and its pretty obvious they don't have the required intellect to deal with any non party line towing visitors, the thin skinned, deluded tossers.
"Whats all this cartel nonsense as well. Surely the Premier league is one of the most open top level leagues there is"
even for Squawk this takes being both deluded and as thick as a great big pile of rocks to hitherto unseen levels... do Bayern play in the PL? do Juventus play in the PL?... Do Real play in the PL?...Do Barca play in the PL? ... Do you understand what role an apostrophe plays in the written form of the English language?...whoops-a-daisy, sorry I forgot for a moment, you're scouse not English... shouldn't criticise you for errors when using a language that isn't your native tongue...
Last edited:
