There seems to be a contradiction in your argument. If you have the best owners, manager and team the Premier league has ever seen (and I actually just about agree with the manager and team part), then shouldn't you expect to win everything and beat everybody all the time? In which case, how exactly does this make Klopp a con man if he loses to the greatest and best? He's never claimed Liverpool are the best team, just that we could beat the best.
With reference to the 5 point lead, theres 32 more games to go and we haven't played the same opposition. If we are in the same position with 3 or 4 games to go, then it would be a different consideration, but if dropping 5 points means a team is bottling it, then surely that would mean that so far this season City have done so? (which I stress again I don't believe so)
How long have you been a dipper?