Definitely an agenda on that programme. After Ali had equalised for the Spuds against Watford and admitted he had controlled the ball with his arm Tim Sherwood said on GOS “it was just about a goal”. They must be making those decisions before they go on air.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
city saint
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 6,700
some dickhead dipper whos a parent of my grandsons team mate keeps hasseling me with shite hes seen on the internet that we have spent half a billion more than them over the last five years,surely that cant be true or is he playing the net spend shite again
Who cares. Tell the twat money well spent winning 7/8 trophies in last two alone.some dickhead dipper whos a parent of my grandsons team mate keeps hasseling me with shite hes seen on the internet that we have spent half a billion more than them over the last five years,surely that cant be true or is he playing the net spend shite again
deano ou812
Well-Known Member
Just tell him to fuck off,and comeback when he has something intelligent to say ...some dickhead dipper whos a parent of my grandsons team mate keeps hasseling me with shite hes seen on the internet that we have spent half a billion more than them over the last five years,surely that cant be true or is he playing the net spend shite again
RadcliffeRick
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 10,216
- Location
- Kuala Lumpur Via Radcliffe
- Team supported
- Manchester City since 2008 Chelsea before that :-)
Even better, ignore the ****, look at him like you would dog shit on your shoe!!
laserblue
Well-Known Member
Just tell him to fuck off.
Edited for accuracy.
Since Moyes time:some dickhead dipper whos a parent of my grandsons team mate keeps hasseling me with shite hes seen on the internet that we have spent half a billion more than them over the last five years,surely that cant be true or is he playing the net spend shite again
Liverpool spent about £600m
you could just reply with: ‘ok let’s list the trophies win in the last 5 years’
Or
‘Let’s total up the total spending since the PL started and compare trophies vs spend’
Or
‘You’re the original mercenary sugar daddy team, from the moment you came into being’
dannyboy29
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 1,292
some dickhead dipper whos a parent of my grandsons team mate keeps hasseling me with shite hes seen on the internet that we have spent half a billion more than them over the last five years,surely that cant be true or is he playing the net spend shite again
They have spent over a billion since the takeover. Hardly penny-pinching and not much to show for it.
Biggest issue for me though is that by all accounts we also knew it wasn't working at Anfield and chose to stay silent over it despite us being fucked over and that for me was the final straw.
When our own club is also bending over to be fucked because of the money pot that is there for us by staying silent the game truly is fucking over and fucked.
We should have ripped the scab off VAR that day for the whole world to see yet chose not too?
If it wasn't working I think City would have chosen to say nothing fearing the backlash from the Premier League backed by the media. They would lie and say it was working, the media would paint us as cry babies and everyone would laugh at us bitter Blues. Pigmol would back the Prem up, certainly Klopp would, you simply would not get anyone to tell the truth and City know it.
Poor, really poor.
Drubas
Well-Known Member
Offside goals and hand balls leading to goals will be disallowed. 100/100 times. No room for interpretation. And there isn't any real time frame. It sucks. But at least we know it sucks and can hope that the rules are changed. There is some sort of clarity.
The (supposed) foul on Origi is the same. Liverpool fans have whined about it afterwards, but it was 100% corred. The guidelines states that no goal should be disallowed (if it goes against a judge's call) unless there is a foul that is clear and beyond any doubt. It was 100% cccording to those guidelines. And that's why the Lovren situation is so completely f*cked up. Me, as a Liverpool fan, can think what I want about the situation. It's not the point. The point is that according to PL:s own guidelines (that's had been followed up until then), it shouldn't even be possible for VAR to disallow the goal.
The (supposed) foul on Origi is the same. Liverpool fans have whined about it afterwards, but it was 100% corred. The guidelines states that no goal should be disallowed (if it goes against a judge's call) unless there is a foul that is clear and beyond any doubt. It was 100% cccording to those guidelines. And that's why the Lovren situation is so completely f*cked up. Me, as a Liverpool fan, can think what I want about the situation. It's not the point. The point is that according to PL:s own guidelines (that's had been followed up until then), it shouldn't even be possible for VAR to disallow the goal.
wagonman
Well-Known Member
How depressing...
After several days down in the dumps because Mr Arthur Right Is crippling me, I pop into BM for the first time for a little while and fall upon a post by Mr Drubas, a poster who really, really gets my goat.
Why does a Scouse Scum worshipper post on a City forum...
I'm going back to bed...
JJ
After several days down in the dumps because Mr Arthur Right Is crippling me, I pop into BM for the first time for a little while and fall upon a post by Mr Drubas, a poster who really, really gets my goat.
Why does a Scouse Scum worshipper post on a City forum...
I'm going back to bed...
JJ
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 19,225
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Offside goals and hand balls leading to goals will be disallowed. 100/100 times. No room for interpretation. And there isn't any real time frame. It sucks. But at least we know it sucks and can hope that the rules are changed. There is some sort of clarity.
The (supposed) foul on Origi is the same. Liverpool fans have whined about it afterwards, but it was 100% corred. The guidelines states that no goal should be disallowed (if it goes against a judge's call) unless there is a foul that is clear and beyond any doubt. It was 100% cccording to those guidelines. And that's why the Lovren situation is so completely f*cked up. Me, as a Liverpool fan, can think what I want about the situation. It's not the point. The point is that according to PL:s own guidelines (that's had been followed up until then), it shouldn't even be possible for VAR to disallow the goal.
You will just have to accept that liverpool are being given every opportunity possible to help them try and win the PL .
The combined efforts of the PL, FA and PiGMOL have been told to ensure that the 29 years without a PL title is brought to and end - no matter whether it is deserved or not.
He also says 100 times out of 100 handballs leading to goals will be chalked off. I give you Deli Ali’s equaliser where he admits handling the ball before scoring. Shows his theory up right there.You will just have to accept that liverpool are being given every opportunity possible to help them try and win the PL .
The combined efforts of the PL, FA and PiGMOL have been told to ensure that the 29 years without a PL title is brought to and end - no matter whether it is deserved or not.
He also says 100 times out of 100 handballs leading to goals will be chalked off. I give you Deli Ali’s equaliser where he admits handling the ball before scoring. Shows his theory up right there.
You are missing the point entirely, Dele Ali is, well Dele Ali, he like Sir Harry of Kane and both are only just under Saint Salah, King Mane and the other scouse deity. They cannot commit handball or be offside unlike mere mortals that dare oppose them.
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Newcastle had a goal stand even though the scorer was seen to handle it to the naked eye,they made the excuse of not having all the angles which is bollocksOffside goals and hand balls leading to goals will be disallowed. 100/100 times. No room for interpretation. And there isn't any real time frame. It sucks. But at least we know it sucks and can hope that the rules are changed. There is some sort of clarity.
The (supposed) foul on Origi is the same. Liverpool fans have whined about it afterwards, but it was 100% corred. The guidelines states that no goal should be disallowed (if it goes against a judge's call) unless there is a foul that is clear and beyond any doubt. It was 100% cccording to those guidelines. And that's why the Lovren situation is so completely f*cked up. Me, as a Liverpool fan, can think what I want about the situation. It's not the point. The point is that according to PL:s own guidelines (that's had been followed up until then), it shouldn't even be possible for VAR to disallow the goal.
You fucking tell them Karen, they genuinely think they get no decisions, what a day on twitter absolutely full of the ****s.Newcastle had a goal stand even though the scorer was seen to handle it to the naked eye,they made the excuse of not having all the angles which is bollocks
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Me and musty have the var decisions downYou fucking tell them Karen, they genuinely think they get no decisions, what a day on twitter absolutely full of the ****s.
journolud
Well-Known Member
^^^^^
They've won the champions league.. Considered by idiots to be the the ultimate prize..
Which really fucks me off as we'd have given them a much better game the Spurs!
Onholiday(somemightsay)
Well-Known Member
Surely this quote could be recycled for the full 365?You fucking tell them Karen, they genuinely think they get no decisions, what a day on twitter absolutely full of the ****s.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.