Liverpool thread 2020/21

[FightLikeAGirl]

Yeah, part of it is the 'you ain't got no istree' bollocks. Even I know that's not true and that Chelsea did, in fact, have some success before Roman Abramovitch.

 

[bobbyowenquiff]

Do you think FSG pay the media ?

No but I am sure they have a lot of influence, especially with the New York Times who first published most of the damaging (and untrue) leaks from the UEFA investigation. It is also public knowledge that JW Henry has a relationship with the Glazers and they have certainly worked together to try and damage City (no matter what people say about the bitter Liverpool/United rivalry).

 

[aguero93:20]

Yeah, part of it is the 'you ain't got no istree' bollocks. Even I know that's not true and that Chelsea did, in fact, have some success before Roman Abramovitch.

Better team than the dippers all through the 90s for starters.

 

[kippaxwarrior]

So Klopp promised them a parade after all this, but how the fuck can you parade something you won a year ago? And if the trophy is indeed won by another team this season, wtf are they going to parade exactly?

hubcaps?

 

[kaz7]

I believe they should have a champions parade if they want one, even if they are not the current champions
They won the league and due to circumstances (this fucking disease) beyond their control, they were denied celebrating it properly

Tought titty , people have died and they want a fucking parade for winning football games, the moment has passed for them like it has for those who have missed birthdays , weddings , hugging loved ones

Just no

 

[Asa's left peg]

Be interesting Kaz, to see what the clubs view is to a parade, should we win it. Imagine if they have one and we say, nah, it's too soon and inappropriate. Wouldn't look good, but then again....

 

[aguero93:20]

Be interesting Kaz, to see what the clubs view is to a parade, should we win it. Imagine if they have one and we say, nah, it's too soon and inappropriate. Wouldn't look good, but then again....

There's a time and a place for that stuff, I wouldn't be comfortable with the idea of having one in May.

 

[mccity]

I didn't think Liverpool were that shite tbf. They did have about 3/4 possession. It was lucky that Pickford was having a good day (as was Keane, one of the better things to come out of the Koeman era).

Whilst they've not been great, Liverpool have actually played fairly well in most if not all of their games on their bad run.

Last season when City struggled, Pep would say how City played well outside the boxes but didn't play well in the boxes. That's the big shift in Liverpool this season. They are making more poor plays and making mistakes right at the back as well as lacking the finishing quality up top. In my opinion this points to problems with fitness and mentality more than anything, something they never struggled too much with for 18/19 and the first 2/3 of last season.

The key difference between City last season and Liverpool this one is that it's a LOT worse for Liverpool. City were far less haphazard at the back and also scored plenty of goals. It was far less frequent for both the attack and the defence to cost City. There were a lot of losses, but there were even more wins.

It took City over a year with clever and big investment to turn the tide. Liverpool need an even bigger momentum shift.

 

[Bill the Blue]

Cut the dippers some slack ffs..

It's still mathematically possible for them to win back to back PL's and cement their standing within the game as a 'GREAT' team..

As we all know, to be considered a 'GREAT' team, back to back PL titles are a must..!

I remember the media constantly banging on about it not too long ago...!





Oh my fkin sides...!

 

[FightLikeAGirl]

Better team than the dippers all through the 90s for starters.

I still remember the 1997 FA Cup. And they were a force to be reckoned with when they had the likes of Zola, Vialli, Leboeuf and Di Matteo.