Liverpool Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry to disabuse of the fact that I am indeed a red/dipper/****/glory hunter or what ever name you wish to use.
The fact that I may make people think that I may be a blue in disguise is perhaps somethign of an issue with the whole of football at present.
The fact it has become so tribal and down right hostile at times. People unwilling to back down, to consider the fact that they could in fact be wrong...when quite often in every day life we are....well thats what the wife tells me regularly!
I will be blinkered at times and have different views but I am willing to admit when I see something wrong.....examples being that I still think Mane on Azpilacueta was a yellow as he didnt look at him. Fabs goal against you should have stood as City player deflected the ball onto TAA's arm , so accidental.......and that Salah only goes to ground when there has been contact...albeit that it may not take that much!

Does that still make me @Blue Mist 's "wingman"?
Fuck this **** off. Scouse vermin.
 
And yet we are 9 points clear at the top so I'm not sure what your point is

This is the second season now this has happened. It doesn't impact much on the grand scheme of things other than not being considered for individual awards, but it does say that our forwards are not performing to the levels they used to perform in 17-19.
 
Top 3 assisters in the League so far:

Trent Alexander Arnold - 10
Mohamed Salah - 9
Andrew Robertson - 8

Compare this with 2017-18 when it was all City at the Top 4
Kevin de Bruyne - 16
Leroy Sane - 15
David Silva - 11
Raheem Sterling - 11

Our players are not individually standing out in either the goals or assists column.
But we are standing out in the wins for and points collected columns..
I know which I prefer
 
Just seen the video of Bingo supplying alcohol to the poor downtrodden masses that were worshiping outside the Liverpool coach and it got me thinking about the law on alcohol on football coaches. So I looked at the legislation;

Section 1(1) of the Sporting Events (Control of Alcohol) Act 1985, as amended by the Public Order Act 1986

1 Offences in connection with alcohol on coaches and trains.
(1)This section applies to a vehicle which
(a) is a public service vehicle or railway passenger vehicle, and
(b) is being used for the principal purpose of carrying passengers for the whole or part of a journey to or from a designated sporting event.
(2) A person who knowingly causes or permits intoxicating liquor to be carried on a vehicle to which this section applies is guilty of an offence
(a) if the vehicle is a public service vehicle and he is the operator of the vehicle or the servant or agent of the operator, or
(b) if the vehicle is a hired vehicle and he is the person to whom it is hired or the servant or agent of that person.
(3) A person who has intoxicating liquor in his possession while on a vehicle to which this section applies is guilty of an offence.
(4) A person who is drunk on a vehicle to which this section applies is guilty of an offence.
(5) In this section public service vehicle and operator have the same meaning as in the Public Passenger Vehicles Act 1981.

It seems to me that the Liverpool team bus is a PSV being used to carry passengers to a designated sporting event. So my reading of the law is that Bingo is guilty of an offence of having liquor in his possession whilst on the vehicle.

Anyone fancy reporting the offence to the Met Police - they've got nothing more important to investigate at the moment!!!!
 
Just seen the video of Bingo supplying alcohol to the poor downtrodden masses that were worshiping outside the Liverpool coach and it got me thinking about the law on alcohol on football coaches. So I looked at the legislation;

Section 1(1) of the Sporting Events (Control of Alcohol) Act 1985, as amended by the Public Order Act 1986

1 Offences in connection with alcohol on coaches and trains.
(1)This section applies to a vehicle which
(a) is a public service vehicle or railway passenger vehicle, and
(b) is being used for the principal purpose of carrying passengers for the whole or part of a journey to or from a designated sporting event.
(2) A person who knowingly causes or permits intoxicating liquor to be carried on a vehicle to which this section applies is guilty of an offence
(a) if the vehicle is a public service vehicle and he is the operator of the vehicle or the servant or agent of the operator, or
(b) if the vehicle is a hired vehicle and he is the person to whom it is hired or the servant or agent of that person.
(3) A person who has intoxicating liquor in his possession while on a vehicle to which this section applies is guilty of an offence.
(4) A person who is drunk on a vehicle to which this section applies is guilty of an offence.
(5) In this section public service vehicle and operator have the same meaning as in the Public Passenger Vehicles Act 1981.

It seems to me that the Liverpool team bus is a PSV being used to carry passengers to a designated sporting event. So my reading of the law is that Bingo is guilty of an offence of having liquor in his possession whilst on the vehicle.

Anyone fancy reporting the offence to the Met Police - they've got nothing more important to investigate at the moment!!!!
It won't be his fault. He'll just blame it on the driver.
 
Just seen the video of Bingo supplying alcohol to the poor downtrodden masses that were worshiping outside the Liverpool coach and it got me thinking about the law on alcohol on football coaches. So I looked at the legislation;

Section 1(1) of the Sporting Events (Control of Alcohol) Act 1985, as amended by the Public Order Act 1986

1 Offences in connection with alcohol on coaches and trains.
(1)This section applies to a vehicle which
(a) is a public service vehicle or railway passenger vehicle, and
(b) is being used for the principal purpose of carrying passengers for the whole or part of a journey to or from a designated sporting event.
(2) A person who knowingly causes or permits intoxicating liquor to be carried on a vehicle to which this section applies is guilty of an offence
(a) if the vehicle is a public service vehicle and he is the operator of the vehicle or the servant or agent of the operator, or
(b) if the vehicle is a hired vehicle and he is the person to whom it is hired or the servant or agent of that person.
(3) A person who has intoxicating liquor in his possession while on a vehicle to which this section applies is guilty of an offence.
(4) A person who is drunk on a vehicle to which this section applies is guilty of an offence.
(5) In this section public service vehicle and operator have the same meaning as in the Public Passenger Vehicles Act 1981.

It seems to me that the Liverpool team bus is a PSV being used to carry passengers to a designated sporting event. So my reading of the law is that Bingo is guilty of an offence of having liquor in his possession whilst on the vehicle.

Anyone fancy reporting the offence to the Met Police - they've got nothing more important to investigate at the moment!!!!
Not acting as PSV.
 
Get it right please...plastic scouse vermin

Sorry to disabuse of the fact that I am indeed a red/dipper/****/glory hunter or what ever name you wish to use.
The fact that I may make people think that I may be a blue in disguise is perhaps somethign of an issue with the whole of football at present.
The fact it has become so tribal and down right hostile at times. People unwilling to back down, to consider the fact that they could in fact be wrong...when quite often in every day life we are....well thats what the wife tells me regularly!
I will be blinkered at times and have different views but I am willing to admit when I see something wrong.....examples being that I still think Mane on Azpilacueta was a yellow as he didnt look at him. Fabs goal against you should have stood as City player deflected the ball onto TAA's arm , so accidental.......and that Salah only goes to ground when there has been contact...albeit that it may not take that much!

Does that still make me @Blue Mist 's "wingman"?
How does it feel to be on your way to losing yet another league title to little old City. Best team you've had in a lifetime and you're also-rans.
 
Openly says he comes here to laugh at us
Spot on @kaz7 ...I do. When I first landed here I loved the whole conspiracy theory mantra that appeared to be everywhere. I said it before and still say it now, that I do chuckle at some of the stuff that is posted here...pretty much the same way as "you lot" chuckle at so much of what is posted on RAWK.

That said and in amongst the banter there are common sense views that you cannot disagree with and I also come here for those. As I have said before, I don't want to be fed and have to listen to the same views I may have. I want to be challenged and made to think.
 
How does it feel to be on your way to losing yet another league title to little old City. Best team you've had in a lifetime and you're also-rans.
It is tough, but it is better than the last 30 odd years of complete crap/mediocrity, the likes of Venison, Cheyrou, Piecnik, Ngog. At least now there is a little bit of hope and it takes something exceptional to beat us.
I must also call you out for being so rude in referring to City with the term "little". Only our manager is allowed to use that term in a footballing sense.
 
Spot on @kaz7 ...I do. When I first landed here I loved the whole conspiracy theory mantra that appeared to be everywhere. I said it before and still say it now, that I do chuckle at some of the stuff that is posted here...pretty much the same way as "you lot" chuckle at so much of what is posted on RAWK.

That said and in amongst the banter there are common sense views that you cannot disagree with and I also come here for those. As I have said before, I don't want to be fed and have to listen to the same views I may have. I want to be challenged and made to think.
Yet you think Salah doesn't dive, now we are all laughing.
 
Just seen the video of Bingo supplying alcohol to the poor downtrodden masses that were worshiping outside the Liverpool coach and it got me thinking about the law on alcohol on football coaches. So I looked at the legislation;

Section 1(1) of the Sporting Events (Control of Alcohol) Act 1985, as amended by the Public Order Act 1986

1 Offences in connection with alcohol on coaches and trains.
(1)This section applies to a vehicle which
(a) is a public service vehicle or railway passenger vehicle, and
(b) is being used for the principal purpose of carrying passengers for the whole or part of a journey to or from a designated sporting event.
(2) A person who knowingly causes or permits intoxicating liquor to be carried on a vehicle to which this section applies is guilty of an offence
(a) if the vehicle is a public service vehicle and he is the operator of the vehicle or the servant or agent of the operator, or
(b) if the vehicle is a hired vehicle and he is the person to whom it is hired or the servant or agent of that person.
(3) A person who has intoxicating liquor in his possession while on a vehicle to which this section applies is guilty of an offence.
(4) A person who is drunk on a vehicle to which this section applies is guilty of an offence.
(5) In this section public service vehicle and operator have the same meaning as in the Public Passenger Vehicles Act 1981.

It seems to me that the Liverpool team bus is a PSV being used to carry passengers to a designated sporting event. So my reading of the law is that Bingo is guilty of an offence of having liquor in his possession whilst on the vehicle.

Anyone fancy reporting the offence to the Met Police - they've got nothing more important to investigate at the moment!!!!
Good spot that, mate, but under section 9 of that Act ‘Interpretation‘, subsection 9(4) provides that the period of a designated sporting event ceases one hour after the end of the event. The beer was provided after the game, not before. It’s difficult to imagine a PL team coach leaving within 60 minutes of full time, especially with all the requisite media obligations at play today - and so I would say no offence as you allege could be made out. For someone to prove that offence they would need to make sure that Klopp knew that beer was on the coach within an hour of full time. That’s almost impossible to prove in the absence of any supporting eyewitness accounts.

What’s also worth noting is that Act was tellingly enacted on 25th July 1985, less than two months after Heysel.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top