Liverpool Thread - 2021/22

[domalino]

they tried to get us banned from champs league & wrote to premier league to investigate us.

Lol. Yes of course they did. Asking for teams that UEFA have found to be in breach of rules to be investigated is not cheating.

As for their employees using old log in details from City, the only people you have to blame for that not being a big story is the club, who preferred to take £1m in return for silence.

Liverpool are cunts. No one is arguing against that, but inventing more and more wild conspiracy theories about them deliberately getting games cancelled by positive tests is just loony nonsense.

Christ, even if you convince yourself they were tired, even if you pretend they would be missing more players (they wouldn't) the simple fact is they could have gotten the game called off by feigning a couple of injuries, which is 100x easier and doesn't involve some conspiracy with a Biotech lab.

 

[City Mike 1969]

This is another one of those half truths that's the conspiracy wing of the forum has run with. FSG haven't got a history of cheating, they employed a coach who was found to be cheating when he managed another team.

You accusing Liverpool of cheating because the Red Sox were tangentially related to a scandal is like RAWK thinking everyone at City dopes because Pep failed a drugs test in Italy.

And that's still not a motive for Liverpool delaying a game when they got no benefit from it. No less congestion, no players back, and Arsenal did get players back.

...so they appointed a coach known for cheating... and then threw him under a bus after he was caught 'stealing signals' whilst employed by their club.


...nothing fishy about it m'lud... no, really!

 

[domalino]

Why do we have to prove a motive.

If there was an investigation it would find why it occurred. I would say the motivation for Parry not investigating was that the outcome could be embarrassing / criminal.

Because if you can't come up with a motive it shows you're just a monkey flinging shit at the wall because you don't like Liverpool.

Which is fine, if you just want to fantasise about Liverpool conspiracies, but it makes you no better than the goons at RAWK or RedCafe and you should admit that instead of pretending this place is better.

 

[domalino]

...so they appointed a coach known for cheating... and then threw him under a bus after he was caught 'stealing signals' whilst employed by their club.


...nothing fishy about it m'lud... no, really!

No, they appointed him before the cheating was known - which you probably knew already.

Again, this is just like RAWK deciding City are doping because Pep failed a drugs test and Barcelona had links to Fuentes.

 

[cheekybids]

Because if you can't come up with a motive it shows you're just a monkey flinging shit at the wall because you don't like Liverpool.

Well your right I don’t like them & it’s for the double standards.

Ok here’s a motive, they decided to use a clinic / lab that was incompetent. Who is responsible for that?

Motive for EFL not investigating - Outcome may have pointed to Arsenal being awarded he game.

 

[halfcenturyup]

This is another one of those half truths that's the conspiracy wing of the forum has run with. FSG haven't got a history of cheating, they employed a coach who was found to be cheating when he managed another team.

You accusing Liverpool of cheating because the Red Sox were tangentially related to a scandal is like RAWK thinking everyone at City dopes because Pep failed a drugs test in Italy.

And that's still not a motive for Liverpool delaying a game when they got no benefit from it. No less congestion, no players back, and Arsenal did get players back.

The coach in this case, Cora, was cheating at Boston, sacked and then later found to have been cheating in a previous team.

Weren't Boston also investigated for illegal coach/player communications using Apple watches and had to promise not to do it again?

It's not a conspiracy to say FSG's baseball franchise was cheating. Whether FSG knew or not is another issue, but trouble does seem to follow them around.

 

[cheekybids]

Lol. Yes of course they did. Asking for teams that UEFA have found to be in breach of rules to be investigated is not cheating.

As for their employees using old log in details from City, the only people you have to blame for that not being a big story is the club, who preferred to take £1m in return for silence.

Liverpool are cunts. No one is arguing against that, but inventing more and more wild conspiracy theories about them deliberately getting games cancelled by positive tests is just loony nonsense.

Christ, even if you convince yourself they were tired, even if you pretend they would be missing more players (they wouldn't) the simple fact is they could have gotten the game called off by feigning a couple of injuries, which is 100x easier and doesn't involve some conspiracy with a Biotech lab.

But we weren’t in breach of the rules & who was on the UEFA committee & found to be leaking - CAS described it as worrisome.

it was that prick Parry again.

 

[domalino]

Ok here’s a motive, they decided to use a clinic / lab that was incompetent. Who is responsible for that?

That's not a motive. A motive is a reason for doing something.

For example, the motive here could be that Dalgish's daughter recently joined the company that did the testing and he wanted to throw some money their way. That would be a motive.

 

[domalino]

The coach in this case, Cora, was cheating at Boston, sacked and then later found to have been cheating in a previous team.

No. FFS this is not true, just look it up it's not that hard.

The Houston Astros scandal came to light when he'd left and joined the Red Sox. The news came out, he got fired, then a big investigation into him found the Red Sox were breaking some rules about what was shown on video replays but they weren't cheating from it.

 

[cheekybids]

That's not a motive. A motive is a reason for doing something.

For example, the motive here could be that Dalgish's daughter recently joined the company that did the testing and he wanted to throw some money their way. That would be a motive.

OK we’ll go with your motive.

who should be punished for that?