Liverpool Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
Didn’t watch the game last night but heard Jon Moss had a stinker. This video doesn’t do him or the league any favours, whether it’s a joke or not
 
Saw this tweet from James Pearce - dipper reporter for The Athletic...



Their net spend over the last decade is £297m or less than 2 years PL tv Money - so where does the rest of their tv money, Champs league tv money, prize money and sponsorship money go? (Obvs wages etc, but that won't equate to the difference).

It's well documented how much the Glazers take out of United and football as a whole. Can't find any reports on how much FSG are leeching out of Liverpool.

Anyone have any figures?
 
BlueBas said:
Saw this tweet from James Pearce - dipper reporter for The Athletic...



Their net spend over the last decade is £297m or less than 2 years PL tv Money - so where does the rest of their tv money, Champs league tv money, prize money and sponsorship money go? (Obvs wages etc, but that won't equate to the difference).

It's well documented how much the Glazers take out of United and football as a whole. Can't find any reports on how much FSG are leeching out of Liverpool.

Anyone have any figures?
Click to expand...

The picture used kind of proves Peps argument. The tombstones gleaming at Talibanfield
 
BlueBas said:
Saw this tweet from James Pearce - dipper reporter for The Athletic...



Their net spend over the last decade is £297m or less than 2 years PL tv Money - so where does the rest of their tv money, Champs league tv money, prize money and sponsorship money go? (Obvs wages etc, but that won't equate to the difference).

It's well documented how much the Glazers take out of United and football as a whole. Can't find any reports on how much FSG are leeching out of Liverpool.

Anyone have any figures?
Click to expand...

James Pearce shows his ignorance again. He doesn't understand finance. There is no such thing as "net spend" because all spending is spread over long periods not in lump sums. It is meaningless. He also takes no account of incomes. City's income over the period is much bigger than Liverpool's because we have won four times more trophies than them and have much more money to play with. We can afford it, just like LFC in the 80s, because we are a trophy-winning club.
To talk about City spending £1.5bn in isolation is ridiculous. For example during the same period Sheikh Mansour raised £700m by selling equity in the club to Chinese and US investment groups. James Pearce is a fucking moron. It's depressing that supporters have to endure such sub-standard journalism. Why can't Pearce check his information or at least ask one of his colleagues (perhaps a Finance Reporter) to check his work before publishing it?
 
ancoats said:
The big différance from Manchester city to Liverpool is the officials, simple ?
Click to expand...
The difference is 3 goals and a game in hand.

Not officials, not asthma medication, not any sort of conspiracy.

We are witnessing two magnificent football sides going head to head.

If your not enjoying this and relishing it, your not a football fan.
 
On June 2, 1985, the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) bans English football (soccer) clubs from competing in Europe. The ban followed the death of 39 Italian and Belgian football fans at Brussels' Heysel Stadium in a riot caused by English football hooligans at that year's European Cup final.
Click to expand...

fourteen Liverpool fans found guilty of manslaughter and each sentenced to six years' imprisonment.
Click to expand...

European royalty my arse.
 
oldius said:
RAWK is laugh out loud funny, this morning.

'Of course they're gonna present the deal as a bona fide 51 million, thats what will go on their books. All the other sweeteners will go via the usual channels. The same channels they were nicked for by uefa yet were exonerated by CAS. It's all bollocks. They know it, we know it but fuck all is said. It's done. The Saudi's did the same thing with the barcodes. Common deniminator? Fucking lawyers, parasites, like agents. Whatever merits we all think about it, the super league will happen whilst uefa, fifa and the pl, take the envelopes. It's not greed by the big clubs, it's self preservation. They know the way the wind is blowing. Fuck the fans revolt. It's all surface encouraged by the uefa, fifa and the oil cluns. Best do it now before the sportswashers contaminate the league. As a Liverpool fan, my destination has always been the Eurpean elite. Fuck the premier league. It's dead in the water'
Click to expand...

Rumbled…..
 
Keeper! said:
His players at Liverpool and at Dortmund would run through a brick wall for him.

The fans and officials at Dortmund were heartbroken when he left.

That's all you need to know, the guy is a cnut but anyone doubting his outstanding managerial talents is just plain wrong.
Click to expand...

Don’t mention brick walls with these mate, it was Chelsea, that’s all you need to know.
 
BlueBas said:
Saw this tweet from James Pearce - dipper reporter for The Athletic...



Their net spend over the last decade is £297m or less than 2 years PL tv Money - so where does the rest of their tv money, Champs league tv money, prize money and sponsorship money go? (Obvs wages etc, but that won't equate to the difference).

It's well documented how much the Glazers take out of United and football as a whole. Can't find any reports on how much FSG are leeching out of Liverpool.

Anyone have any figures?
Click to expand...

What about the 1.2 billion in City bank for actually winning things
 
BlueBas said:
Saw this tweet from James Pearce - dipper reporter for The Athletic...



Their net spend over the last decade is £297m or less than 2 years PL tv Money - so where does the rest of their tv money, Champs league tv money, prize money and sponsorship money go? (Obvs wages etc, but that won't equate to the difference).

It's well documented how much the Glazers take out of United and football as a whole. Can't find any reports on how much FSG are leeching out of Liverpool.

Anyone have any figures?
Click to expand...


Juggernauts don’t end up with just 3 trophies to show for it.
 
sh249 said:
Klopp is obviously a very good manager, but I think you‘re spot on here.
The plucky underdog thing is his entire schtick - and their fans, and the media, have bought into this entirely. So he operates under virtually no pressure.
Can‘t be sure how he‘d do with a club like us, working under constant pressure to win trophies or be dubbed a failure. But personally, I don‘t think he‘d last 5 minutes.
Click to expand...
Especially with the disparity in decisions.
 
JASR said:
There's a post on the Erling news HYS on the BBC stating 'Manchester City the Lance Armstrong of Football'.
Reported as defamatory.
Reply "does not break House rules".

So that means to be consistent, you can freely say
"Liverpool the 'Vlad the Inhaler's' of Football", and it won't be taken down...

... unless of course , the media bias towards Liverpool is real...

Edit: Posted, so we shall see.
Click to expand...
we all know the outcome of this before it happens. Any posting that mentions computer hacking,imaginary new grounds, attempts to rip of the British taxpayers etc etc will see the light of day for as long as it takes a dipper to see their arse about it.
I used to go to the trouble of explaining why comments mentioning cheating / financial doping etc etc were defamatory - for the benefit of the mods... nothing gets taken down though. So, these days if I'm reporting something I just tick the relevant box and go to the further comments box and state

'I'm reporting this because it breaks your own website's rules. I pay towards the upkeep of your website via my licence fee- but I know you won't take it down because you're incapable of doing your job properly, owing to your being a bitter, biased, smelly mess who rummages in bins for their dinner every night'.
 
ancoats said:
The big différance from Manchester city to Liverpool is the officials, simple ?
Click to expand...
Most games we see the same kind of decisions and mostly in their favour. After the games we see the same type of comments on social media from opposition supporters complaining about how they are not allowed to compete against LiVARpool. As City have become stronger the decisions have become more blatant.
 
BlueBas said:
Saw this tweet from James Pearce - dipper reporter for The Athletic...



Their net spend over the last decade is £297m or less than 2 years PL tv Money - so where does the rest of their tv money, Champs league tv money, prize money and sponsorship money go? (Obvs wages etc, but that won't equate to the difference).

It's well documented how much the Glazers take out of United and football as a whole. Can't find any reports on how much FSG are leeching out of Liverpool.

Anyone have any figures?
Click to expand...

And the trophy count for the same period is?
 
BlueBas said:
Saw this tweet from James Pearce - dipper reporter for The Athletic...



Their net spend over the last decade is £297m or less than 2 years PL tv Money - so where does the rest of their tv money, Champs league tv money, prize money and sponsorship money go? (Obvs wages etc, but that won't equate to the difference).

It's well documented how much the Glazers take out of United and football as a whole. Can't find any reports on how much FSG are leeching out of Liverpool.

Anyone have any figures?
Click to expand...

FSG have loaded a £250M loan on to them as well
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top