Liverpool Thread - 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
The reason the ATV song upsets them so much is because it highlights DARVO. (Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender)

That’s been their strategy, that’s their get out of jail card & it’s blatantly obvious to all other supporters across Europe. So they increase their victim campaign to even higher levels making the chant even more appropriate.

The proof it’s all a sham is not 1 person has flashbacks or fear when they were all jam packed throwing bottles & flares at our coach but put them in a queue & they won’t leave they’ll stay & try to get in.
 
I don’t see how it could be an enforceable law in any way, unless someone was expressly prohibited from actually singing the words ‘Hillsborough’ or ‘Heysel’ in a song.

What are they going to do, provide a schedule with prohibited songs? How the fuck does that work? What if supporters changed the words slightly? Would there be lobbying as the whether ‘always the victims’ should be in there? What would the basis be for making that song illegal to sing? What if the person charged said he was singling ‘victim’, not ‘victims’. How are the prosecution going to prove that? Or are they going to widen the scope to include singular and plural?

It would be an absolute abortion.
It's happening now. There were screens in the concourse showing bans for fans and abusive chants were in there. It's wank because the 'always the victims' as we all know has fuck all to do with Hillsborough, but they've convinced the BBC and everyone else that it is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.