Liverpool Thread - 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wait til cup final day, you'll change your opinion.

Dippers attack a Coach

Rags attack families, women, children, single fans minding their own business etc etc etc
2 cheeks of the same arse!!! Only difference is the lfc cheek has a shit smear on it. Hate utd but despise liverpool and pity arsenal.
 
Do we want these dickheads in the Thursday night cup next season? No Europe would make their league season alot simpler.

Spuds are in freefall
Brighton`s run in is horrendous
Villa - another set of dickheads, but on a lower level
It's an interesting point you bring up about whether Liverpool should compete in the Thursday night cup ดูบอลสดฟรี next season. While it might make their league season less complicated, European competitions offer a unique challenge and prestige that many clubs strive for. As for the other teams you mentioned the end of the season can indeed be unpredictable with various factors impacting their final positions. Let's see how it all unfolds!
 
Last edited:
More like this VAR team beat Man City by 19 points. If VAR hasn't been introduced they'd have never won a title. I'm not convinced we'd have won it that year either but we'll never know as it was never a level playing field.
The VAR decisions given for them and against us at the beginning of that season was totally blatant. Liverpool were winning that title one way or another before it even started. That was clear and obvious.
 
totally agree about it being like rawk here sometimes with the paranoia, I really hope we dont grow like that fanbase into something ugly.

But Haaland and Jota tackles? Nah totally different.

Haaland - Couldnt have been aware of the guy. Soft contact. No intention to put someone in danger.
Jota - Could see what was coming. Quite a hard contact causing bleeding. Had every intention of putting someone in danger to get the ball.

I hate those false equivalences, and immediately Jota was accused the lfc fans were getting out their City videos and clips they got saved up for these occasions (Why City I dont know).
I assume that you have spoken to Haaland as to his intentions, along with the subject of his tackle to ascertain how hard or soft the contact was?
I also assume that you have chatted with Jota as to the same points?
It's all moot anyway, as neither were shown red and it just comes down to allegiance as to your view and then abit of subjective opinion.

...Which is obviously why my view differs from most on here.
From my viewing (with red tinted glasses on), if he had been shown red immediately then I'm not sure I could have argued. However, when he was not and the reasons have been given I can see why it was treated the same as Haalands. In Jota's case his foot was high, studs showing and was reckless. Skipp did not make contact with the ball as Jota had made contact first and the ball was moving away. Perhaps the same reason as why Skipp didnt see red for the tackle of Dias earlier, where he made slight contact with the ball but the follow through went into the ankle?

Because they love to attach themselves to us.
Like a boil to an arse
So does that make me the boil and City members here the arse?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.