The guardian article quoted a few posts back, says he cost £64m… give it till the summer and he’ll be below Haaland’s £51m!
To be fair, I think the £85m included a lot of performance-based bonuses, and given how shit his performances have been, I think it's safe to say they probably haven't had to pay them yet.
Hilarious that he was ever compared to Haaland. He's not even as good as the player we brought in for £14m from Argentina.
Nunez: 25 starts, 15 subs, 2213 mins, 14 goals
Alvarez: 19 starts, 23 subs,1711 mins, 14 goals
Oh, and that's not counting the four goals on the way to winning the World Cup.
You know what, in any other circumstances, that'd be an alright first season for a youngish striker. But they paid world class money for him and got the return of a decent mid-table striker. Alvarez is playing in a team where he's often the second striker, whereas Nunez is supposed to be the main man.