No, he most certainly isn’t.
I can almost feel the indignation in that post lol.
No, he most certainly isn’t.
@SWP's back has learnt most of his fancy words from me.I can almost feel the indignation in that post lol.
I thought he was talking about Salah’s new salary tbh…Steady on…
Haha! I wish!I thought he was talking about Salah’s new salary tbh…
And why it was being used to describe a relative in the manner French.Being a north Manchester lad I had to look up the word insouciant.....
It must be exhausting to have to constantly sail against the wind.
Not sure how serious this is.
Salah was already there. They haven't added him. They've lost Mane, one of their most crucial game winners, and brought in a promising striker who is utterly untested at the top level. They've also apparently smashed their delicate wage structure to keep Salah around, quite possibly causing dressing room unrest. By what possible metric do they "look a lot stronger going into next year"?
No one is questioning that Salah isn't a great player but what we are questioning is the finances involved.
Liverpool have completely smashed their wage structure and have almost doubled his wages. You don't think players like Van Dijk ect are going to be on the phone to their agents asking for parity?
Just like the rags in 2010 when they smashed their wage structure to keep Rooney Liverpool have left themselves exposed to players demanding what they want.
They already have the 5th highest wage bill in world football and I would imagine by the end of next season they will be higher.
FSG are used to low balling in business and this is Uncharted Territory for them
KdB?Liverpool have had the best out of Salah and his time is up, stupid to give him £400.000 a week for 3 seasons
this is why chasing teams fail and Manchester city keep one step ahead
Manchester city know the value of a player and what he brings to the table, not many demand a wage increase and get it. The player would be out the door at Salah age asking for £400.000 and rightly so
KdB?