Liverpool Thread - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
Alan Harper's Tash said:
Narrator: He didn’t.
Click to expand...
He 100% did for the first one!

At half time they ran the clip of the incident and he (crouching down aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand lengthening his words as he watched the slow-mo) waited and shouted "THERE!" at the "contact" and then again as he explained that forward's landing foot almost stood on the defender's foot. He went on to say that the contact was minimal and probably not enough to foul the attacker but then explained that going down in that situation was the "correct thing to do".

Narrator: He did!
 
Oddchild said:
I'll leave this here:

www.espn.co.uk

How VAR decisions have affected every Premier League club in 2023-24

We're collating a league table of overturned VAR decisions in 2023-24. Who will benefit most over the course of the Premier League season?
www.espn.co.uk www.espn.co.uk

View attachment 103092
Click to expand...

None of that states if the correct decision was reached, it’s just murky nonsense between onfield & off field decisions.

For e.g. if a team get a microscopic offside goal disallowed after VAR it will show as -1 & yet the correct decision was eventually found.
 
cheekybids said:
The ‘Thoughtbank’ has already created a thread about how they were victims again last night along with customary Rodri hand ball.

They can’t even keep their head down after last night when being gifted 2 pens & Geordies having a goal disallowed.

The fucking audacity of the cheeky victim cunts!View attachment 103091View attachment 103090
Click to expand...
Aaron Barber answering his own conundrum there.
 
the-ecstacy-of-eight said:
He 100% did for the first one!

At half time they ran the clip of the incident and he (crouching down aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand lengthening his words as he watched the slow-mo) waited and shouted "THERE!" at the "contact" and then again as he explained that forward's landing foot almost stood on the defender's foot. He went on to say that the contact was minimal and probably not enough to foul the attacker but then explained that going down in that situation was the "correct thing to do".

Narrator: He did!
Click to expand...
He tried his best for the first one. He said the second was a dive.

Narrator: Good try.
 
Oddchild said:
I'll leave this here:

www.espn.co.uk

How VAR decisions have affected every Premier League club in 2023-24

We're collating a league table of overturned VAR decisions in 2023-24. Who will benefit most over the course of the Premier League season?
www.espn.co.uk www.espn.co.uk

View attachment 103092
Click to expand...
Tell me where our plus 2 came from and your minus 3? You got a very dubious decision at ours for a difference of plus 3 to us, a shocking sending off for Palace when there were in control. Nunez failed to get sent off for dissent, a foul for your first goal against Sheffield United which changed the game (scored late on when SU wee pushing for an equaliser). Bowen non penalty, Konate clear second yellow, and last night, I’ll just fucking leave it there you clown.
 
roach3 said:
If you’re asking a liverpool fan for an honest opinion your going to be disappointed

If those decisions went the other way they would be calling out the prem var pgmol and demanding replays apologies etc.

The dippers are actually calling those penalty’s stone fucking wall!!
Click to expand...
Spot on mate. Everyone can see it. However, they just cry arse over everything and the media goes along with their fiction.
 
hammocity said:
Tell me where our plus 2 came from and your minus 3? You got a very dubious decision at ours for a difference of plus 3 to us, a shocking sending off for Palace when there were in control. Nunez failed to get sent off for dissent, a foul for your first goal against Sheffield United which changed the game (scored late on when SU wee pushing for an equaliser). Bowen non penalty, Konate clear second yellow, and last night, I’ll just fucking leave it there you clown.
Click to expand...
If you click on the teams in the article it shows what they are counting our 2 are laughable
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
I will.

When you chat bollocks, you need a good memory, which sadly you don’t seem to possess.

Your dad Mexico will be really disappointed in your use of Twitter.

If you think him saying it wasn’t a penalty live on air last night isn’t from his own mouth, I’m not sire I can help you.
Click to expand...

It’s a video clip from the broadcast last night, not some random users view plucked off social media used to back up an argument.

Carragher is clearly seen and heard saying there is contact and it’s a penalty.

I will now allow you to have your final last word as always and I promise I won’t reply.
 
blueinsa said:
It’s a video clip from the broadcast last night, not some random users view plucked off social media used to back up an argument.

Carragher is clearly seen and heard saying there is contact and it’s a penalty.

I will now allow you to have your final last word as always and I promise I won’t reply.
Click to expand...
I gave you the courtesy of watching it. He gave both sides, as you are probably aware, but that didn’t fit your narrative.

I’ll await your next inevitable rubbishing of Twitter as a source and smile at your hypocrisy.
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
He tried his best for the first one. He said the second was a dive.

Narrator: Good try.
Click to expand...
Tried his best?? You've been shown the clip from his half-time analysis where he says it's the correct decision (both to go down AND to award a penalty) and you're still banging the drum that he didn't give a "ministry of truth" explanation!

As for the second one, he stopped any discussion at the full-time whistle by breaking off to wait (for about 2 or 3 minutes) with baited-breath for Bingo to run around on the pitch and do a fist pump and shout!

Sky then went to a commercial break at which point I switched off the BTN broadcast as it was clearly propaganda!

How does your garden grow Mary? ;)
 
117 M34 said:
Who needs VAR when the ref gives you everything
Click to expand...
There was a huge fuss the first year of VAR because Liverpool had more decisions overturned than any other club.

The fans were up in arms about being targeted unfairly.

Problem was that the majority of decisions being overturned were objective ones like offside.

Turns out they were getting more overturns by VAR because they were getting more dodgy on-field decisions, which had to be overturned. It would be quite the coincidence if the only favourable decisions were those that VAR had to overturn.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top