Wirtz is a creative type, more like KDB, IMO. Bernardo, for me, is more like Paqueta in terms of his work-rate and defensive and offensive contributions.Foden is very similar to bernardo, and will replace him, wirtz is also similar to both.
Wirtz is a creative type, more like KDB, IMO. Bernardo, for me, is more like Paqueta in terms of his work-rate and defensive and offensive contributions.Foden is very similar to bernardo, and will replace him, wirtz is also similar to both.
No, he wanted to go on loan but Pep said no.My understanding is the club wanted him to stay and go on loan but he’d lost patience and told Pep either play me or sell me
Not quite. He told Pep he wanted more game time or to go out on loan. Pep told him to get his head down & earn his place, or the only way he'd be leaving is permanently, so he left.My understanding is the club wanted him to stay and go on loan but he’d lost patience and told Pep either play me or sell me
I suppose Palmer wanted to be a big fish in a small pond, rather than vice versa. As good as he's been, Palmer wouldn't start the big games for us over Bernardo.Not quite. He told Pep he wanted more game time or to go out on loan. Pep told him to get his head down & earn his place, or the only way he'd be leaving is permanently, so he left.
Firstly fair play to Palmer because he’s gone there and delivered. He wasn’t given chances at City so was a risk but he’s shown his potential.I suppose Palmer wanted to be a big fish in a small pond, rather than vice versa. As good as he's been, Palmer wouldn't start the big games for us over Bernardo.
Fair play as he's been Chelsea's best player this season by a large margin, albeit that doesn't say much given their mid-table form.
I actually view it as a massive positive that he's shining at Chelsea. Young english talents will see the success stories of Palmer and Foden as reasons to come play for our academy. And we can put higher price tags on players coming out of our academy. It's good for business.
Why do we act like work rate is something either a player does or does not have, its purely down to willingness to run.Wirtz is a creative type, more like KDB, IMO. Bernardo, for me, is more like Paqueta in terms of his work-rate and defensive and offensive contributions.
It’s also Pep’s first prerequisite in players. They don’t run? They don’t play.Why do we act like work rate is something either a player does or does not have, its purely down to willingness to run.
I have a coaching license for yank football, so I feel somewhat qualified to talk about this.It’s also Pep’s first prerequisite in players. They don’t run? They don’t play.
Let me rephrase. For me, Bernardo or Paqueta demonstrate an absolute top-level workrate in vast majority of matches, demonstrating higher levels of consistency in the said workrate than most of the team. Obviously, everyone works hard or they wouldn't be here. For me, some work extra hard, thus contributing to more areas of the game. For example, both defensively and offensively extensively, and not simply prioritizing one over the other like players with more one-sided (attacking or defending) profiles. Someone like Erling Haaland is incredible at what he does, and probably better at what his does than Bernardo and his skillset, but Erling doesn't work as hard, IMO.Why do we act like work rate is something either a player does or does not have, its purely down to willingness to run.
Do you think you could get Ederson to enjoy running?I have a coaching license for yank football, so I feel somewhat qualified to talk about this.
effort(basically what workrate is, can be taught, and is more a personality thing rather than a physical quality that you either have or dont.