franksinatra
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 10,671
Well if a club is thinking of paying the fees being quoted it should be a consideration.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Lucas Paqueta investigated by FA for alleged betting breaches
- Thread starter TRUE BLUE NO1
- Start date
Well if a club is thinking of paying the fees being quoted it should be a consideration.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
The club will pay what they think his value is. Hopefully, both parties are not a million miles apart and it will get done soon.I was more thinking from the City perspective what has he done to consider paying the fee being mentioned.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
Disagree. You are looking at it from what he did for WH, not what he could do for us.Well if a club is thinking of paying the fees being quoted it should be a consideration.
They would but they wont get it because its this simple, city would like him but we dont need him, his release clause kicks in next summer and we will take him them and they will be left with a pissed off player for a season, it would be a smart move for them to ask for the release clause now and be done with itWest Ham would be mad not to demand 100m too.
Mahrez and Gundog have left sure, but when you consider 2 world class players, Foden and Alvarez need to get way more game time, not sure we need to many reinforcements.We need numbers, as it stands we are 2 players short (winger and a cm) imo. One injury and we are pretty fucked tbh
When Kev is fit, Phil plays on the right. When he isn't, Phil plays in the middle.
Bernie and Kova can alternate, with Bernie filling in on the right when required.
The big issue is what happens when Jack is injured.
City need a player now. Guessing they wont return next summer with probably other targets ready then.They would but they wont get it because its this simple, city would like him but we dont need him, his release clause kicks in next summer and we will take him them and they will be left with a pissed off player for a season, it would be a smart move for them to ask for the release clause now and be done with it
Only hope West Ham wont up the demands AND hope Paqueta will force a move.
Tevez City
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 May 2010
- Messages
- 13,837
Mahrez and Gundog have left sure, but when you consider 2 world class players, Foden and Alvarez need to get way more game time, not sure we need to many reinforcements.
When Kev is fit, Phil plays on the right. When he isn't, Phil plays in the middle.
Bernie and Kova can alternate, with Bernie filling in on the right when required.
The big issue is what happens when Jack is injured.
If Jack is injured, Foden or Alvarez can fill in.
Exeter Blue I am here
Well-Known Member
Given that Bernie and Foden are 2 of our only 3 realistic options out wide as well, there's no way on Earth we've got enough midfield cover, particularly as McAtee and Perrone just aren't ready for the 1st team, except on an occasional basis off the bench.De Bruyne, Bernardo, Foden, Kovacic, Perrone, McAtee is enough in midfield. Would rather make do for a season than go and get Paqueta.
West Ham would be mad not to demand 100m too.
Offer 86m last day of the transfer window! That's 1m more than they'd get in January window