Lucas Paqueta investigated by FA for alleged betting breaches

around the time of aloku comments about us not really being in for him,someone on here suggested we only bid to up the price west ham wanted, god did i call them out on it.

a few weeks later and my conspiracy theory sensors are twitching, just a hunch but here goes( i expect to get called a **** for this btw)
when we were talking to west ham about "rice" maybe were weren't, maybe we were talking about paqueta , get involved in the rice "auction" because arsenal would see that as a small victory against us when they outbid us, then we can talk about paqueta , im more than likely a million miles away, but i always claim our management team are on a different level to most other clubs.
Thought crossed my mind too, either that or we where tying up WH in negotiations, big fees and a lot of stress, they’ve been working on multiple deals (with growing discontent from their fans) and just maybe we where hoping they’d get a bit lethargic when approached about Paqueta, and more susceptible to a deal
 
Surely if the price gets inflated by very recent market conditions then any player exchange deal has a similar price increase?
In fact it may be financially advantageous for WHU to remain at their pre Liverpool 111m level.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.