73* and 95 is a big difference in cash though. Hopefully Palmer on loan can lower it 10m.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Lucas Paqueta investigated by FA for alleged betting breaches
- Thread starter TRUE BLUE NO1
- Start date
Its obviously in Euros, the report.115m quid, this place is worse than twitter. Anyone saying it's 115m quid should get banned right away, haha.
Phillips really costing us here. him included this could be a good deal financially. also it would stop Moyes spend shit load on the dross from United.
they want a big price for Paqueta so they can pay big for Maguire, McTominay. that doesnt sit well with me.
compared to Phillips +25m, that would stop them going for McTominay at least.
Phillips+25-30m + Palmer on loan is not a bad package.
then we still can put 115m on caicedo. :)
they want a big price for Paqueta so they can pay big for Maguire, McTominay. that doesnt sit well with me.
compared to Phillips +25m, that would stop them going for McTominay at least.
Phillips+25-30m + Palmer on loan is not a bad package.
then we still can put 115m on caicedo. :)
nmc
Well-Known Member
Tolmie always uses that phrase too but the fact is we do. We can be ruthless. Kane was left swinging for one.
I think Kane was left hanging simply because the information his agent /brother told us was simply not reliable or true. We had no option but to walk away. We were told if we bid £100m Kane could secure a move. We were then told it was £150m which was wholly at odds with what the agent told us.
Tolmie tweeted in response to some guy that we would be willing to go as high as 85m quid + Palmer on loan. Sounds about right. I reckon this will get done by Wednesday next week.73* and 95 is a big difference in cash though. Hopefully Palmer on loan can lower it 10m.
FatedBlue77
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Jun 2023
- Messages
- 377
- Team supported
- Manchester city
The premier league market is absolutely cooked at the moment. It’s bad enough buying players in general as a PL club but transfers between PL clubs? Why not look a bit outside maybe Europe like we did for Alvarez? There are good players available like Florentino Luiz and Frederick redondo for example who would be available for a fraction of the price.
foggy1974
Well-Known Member
Isn't that the problem that there is a bereft of world class players. 10 to 15 years ago you could ask football fans to pick a world 11 & there would be about 5 or 6 players who were nailed on & then the rest would depend on which team you supported or hated.West Ham won’t get that sort of money off anyone else outside Saudi. They must really want to keep him and have nobody lined up as a replacement.
Buying from another PL club is the worst VFM you can get. If City are happy with that then fair enough but you would think for that money there would be plenty of players better outside the PL.
On a second point Brighton’s hit rate is phenomenal….we need that algorithm and cut out the middle man!
xgorton
Well-Known Member
It will be 95m Euro's,£80m pounds.73* and 95 is a big difference in cash though. Hopefully Palmer on loan can lower it 10m.
Is the correct answer.To those bandying about 9 digit numbers, a reminder that 110m Euros equates to £95mill. Surely £85m and Palmer on loan sees this done.