Lucas Paqueta investigated by FA for alleged betting breaches

[Barcon]

What's wrong with Chileans ?

I don't know. It just sounded funny in my head.

 

[Bill Walker]

I don't know. It just sounded funny in my head.

Haha you mad sod.
DIL is Chilean :)

 

[Barcon]

Haha you mad sod.
DIL is Chilean :)

 

[Bill Walker]

Haha wtf ?
Is that a Chilean dog ?

 

[Barcon]

Haha wtf ?
Is that a Chilean dog ?

Dil the dog. Shirley you remember him. I thought you were saying he was Chilean.

 

[Bill Walker]

Dil the dog. Shirley you remember him. I thought you were saying he was Chilean.

Never seen Dil before

We'd better get back to the off topic mate we're fucking up some serious shit up here :)

 

[Chi-town blues]

What's wrong with Chileans ?

Chilians are spicy ?

 

[eyalluvitt]

I'm also in the Americas, but the very South bit. Top tip, bbc.com works over here! ;-)

Brownsville ?

 

[Asa's left peg]

Nurse! Nurse!

 

[johnny crossan]

Paqueta didn't place the bets. Also the Brazilian betting industry is unregulated, & the bets mostly came from a raft of new accounts, which makes the investigation almost impossible to conduct.

Dodgy as fuck yeah, but how dya link these spot bets to Paqueta without a betting account audit trail, witnesses, messages or recordings?

Also, considering you're innocent until proven guilty, unless specific evidence is presented to Paqueta, he's got no case to answer. This investigation sounds more like a fishing exercise.

If he says, "I know fuck all about any of this", what then? You don't need a brief to interrupt his hols for that... \0/

With respect the eventual outcome of the FA/FIFA investigation is irrelevant, what's at issue is whether Sullivan et al were aware of it before negotiating the transfer deal and concealed the information from City. Doubt whether we can show the required financial loss to take it to law though.