ONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN
Well-Known Member
IMO RB is more a concern than LB.
If Zaba is out we have Micah who is not good enough.
If Zaba is out we have Micah who is not good enough.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Luke shaw
- Thread starter ElMatador
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
avi.singh9993
Member
- Joined
- 24 Jun 2013
- Messages
- 21
Micah is good enough but he is never fit enough. Just look him playing in full fitness he just steam rolls the opponents. He should be given more time for full fitness. MaybeONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN said:IMO RB is more a concern than LB.
If Zaba is out we have Micah who is not good enough.
dave_blue12
Well-Known Member
Hopefully we will just push up the price that Chelsea have to pay ;-)
The Blue Right Hand
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Aug 2012
- Messages
- 69
avi.singh9993 said:Micah is good enough but he is never fit enough. Just look him playing in full fitness he just steam rolls the opponents. He should be given more time for full fitness. MaybeONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN said:IMO RB is more a concern than LB.
If Zaba is out we have Micah who is not good enough.
Nah, he's not good enough. Nowhere near. CLueless going forward, lost a lot of his pace, can't control the ball particualrly well. And, we have't got a spare year for him to try and regain fitness!
itsnevereasy
Well-Known Member
rick.mcfc.40145 said:avi.singh9993 said:Micah is good enough but he is never fit enough. Just look him playing in full fitness he just steam rolls the opponents. He should be given more time for full fitness. MaybeONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN said:IMO RB is more a concern than LB.
If Zaba is out we have Micah who is not good enough.
Nah, he's not good enough. Nowhere near. CLueless going forward, lost a lot of his pace, can't control the ball particualrly well. And, we have't got a spare year for him to try and regain fitness!
he is good but for a specific system, if we play one up front that leaves one player who can cover for his stroll back into position after his lung busting runs forward. However we currently tend to play with two up front, this means the full backs don't have that extra cover so he has to work harder to get back, this decreases his concentration levels and then he makes mistakes or forgets he should be getting back into position. I still believe that he would be best as a centre back as it would have less physical demands on him.
totallywired
Well-Known Member
Luke Shaw would be agreat signing. He has great energy and attacking instincts , this lad could also fill the wide left position. Don`t forget Bale started as a full back and only blossomed when he was moved forward under twitcher. I would make him and a quality centre half a priorty. Then replace anybody else who moves on.
JamesMCFC
Well-Known Member
He'll go Chelsea since he's a big fan apparently.
nmc
Well-Known Member
PSmyth07 said:Micah is definitely good enough. In the title winning season i'd say he was better than Zabaleta.
Have you watched his recent displays - admittedly often coming back from injury but very poor and a million miles behind Zabaleta.
the originalkippaxman
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jul 2012
- Messages
- 1,558
PSmyth07 said:Micah is definitely good enough. In the title winning season i'd say he was better than Zabaleta.
Micah is the prime example I use when explaining the sought of players that City should not buy. Basically would he get in any of the Top 7 teams and IMO the answer is a clear no.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.