Madeleine McCann

[dronefromsector7G]

Because I dont believe the info should be on a public forum, and it also opens me up to questions about how I got the info.

Out of interest did you spell Gandhi wrong on purpose?

 

[Ghandi's Flip Flops]

Out of interest did you spell Gandhi wrong on purpose?

Yes, long story regarding gamer tags I used to use 20 odd years ago

 

[Ghandi's Flip Flops]

Well that's bollocks anyway.

???
Approx dates
Bulger case - 1993
Facebook - 2004
Twitter - 2006

 

[Stephen230]

Would be intetested, i habe only ever hesrd the "official line". Any idea of where i might find out more?

Not specific to not following the “official line” but I read an article years ago by a journalist who was in court for the whole hearing.

He said that the judge issued an order to the press that certain details of the torture that took place should never be reported, due to amongst other reasons, the physiological damage it could cause the reader.

When you think of some of the horrific details that were released, it doesn’t bare thinking about what the other stuff might have been.

 

[Johnny Mars Bar]

Out of interest did you spell Gandhi wrong on purpose?

If he spelled it right they would be able to find him and silence him.

 

[stonerblue]

If a senior person at MCFC (who had signed a NDA) passed you details of city's next signing, would you post it in a public forum along with their name?

Dunno, might do.
So you're implying that you have inside info from a senior source?

 

[Uncle Wally One Ball]

Yes, long story regarding gamer tags I used to use 20 odd years ago

Give over, what a load of shit. You may well have used that tag, but just say you spelt it wrong.

 

[Ghandi's Flip Flops]

Dunno, might do.
So you're implying that you have inside info from a senior source?

No comment ;)

 

[Maintainin]

If a senior person at MCFC (who had signed a NDA) passed you details of city's next signing, would you post it in a public forum along with their name?

Dunno, might do.
So you're implying that you have inside info from a senior source?

No comment ;)

 

[M18CTID]

FWIW, I received a PM off @Ghandi's Flip Flops regarding the Jamie Bulger case over 6 years ago. I'm not saying what he told me is 100% gospel but if it was, it would go some way to explaining one of the specifics of the case. I would add that none of what he told me alters the fact that Venables and Thompson were the guilty parties just in case anyone was wondering if it was some wild conspiracy regarding the killers themselves.

 

[Maintainin]

FWIW, I received a PM off @Ghandi's Flip Flops regarding the Jamie Bulger case over 6 years ago. I'm not saying what he told me is 100% gospel but if it was, it would go some way to explaining one of the specifics of the case. I would add that none of what he told me alters the fact that Venables and Thompson were the guilty parties just in case anyone was wondering if it was some wild conspiracy regarding the killers themselves.

 

[Ghandi's Flip Flops]

This has got out of hand.
The info I received was from the ex-wife of one of the senior investigators on the Bulger case.

I'll leave this post up for a while and will probably delete it later, so please dont quote

 

[Maintainin]

This has got out of hand.
The info I received was from the ex-wife of one of the senior investigators on the Bulger case.

 

[Ghandi's Flip Flops]

Lol, ask the people who've had the pm's.

 

[Sir peace frog]

if its about what they actually did to him , you wouldn't want to know

 

[M18CTID]

if its about what they actually did to him , you wouldn't want to know

It's not. Thankfully

 

[Johnny Mars Bar]

This has got out of hand.
The info I received was from the ex-wife of one of the senior investigators on the Bulger case.

I'll leave this post up for a while and will probably delete it later, so please dont quote

The truth is out there.

 

[kaz7]

Everything that was done to jamie was read out in court , it was vile and there would be no point subverting the law to hide anything else , i call bollocks on the pm bollocks

Bollocks

 

[M18CTID]

Everything that was done to jamie was read out in court , it was vile and there would be no point subverting the law to hide anything else , i call bollocks on the pm bollocks

Bollocks

You're on the wrong horse Kaz. What he pm'ed me (and others) about is nothing to do with what was done to Jamie.

 

[kaz7]

You're on the wrong horse Kaz. What he pm'ed me (and others) about is nothing to do with what was done to Jamie.

Maybe not today but now he reckons he has info on the maddie case that nobody else knows , still think bullshit