Making a Murderer

Just finished it.

The whole thing is just littered with lies and back handing. Quite how he was convicted with what was on the table will puzzle me until the day I die, and I actually think he killed her. It will puzzle me because if ever I found myself in a scenario like that and I was innocent, I'd stand no chance.

Any rational human being could see that no evidence at all places her at his house, and what they were using was a plant.

For me I think they had him killing her somewhere else but couldn't prove it so framed him.

The whole system was fucked throughout and there are a lot guilty people who walked away from it all.

CAN'T DO SPOILER THING ON MY PHONE - NEXT PARAGRAPH IS FULL OF THEM


No way did he do it in my opinion. Think the police could have done more to look at the ex boyfriend (all that voicemail stuff?) or Bobby Dassey and the other uncle/step dad (false alibis etc. seemed desperate to blame Steven and Brendan). Either way those police officers and in particular Kratz and Lent are pure fucking scum. To give all those false details to the public before a trial he was up shit creek without a paddle from the start. And Kratz saying it would have been easier to just kill him?!! Seriously how does that even cross someone's mind.
 
CAN'T DO SPOILER THING ON MY PHONE - NEXT PARAGRAPH IS FULL OF THEM


No way did he do it in my opinion. Think the police could have done more to look at the ex boyfriend (all that voicemail stuff?) or Bobby Dassey and the other uncle/step dad (false alibis etc. seemed desperate to blame Steven and Brendan). Either way those police officers and in particular Kratz and Lent are pure fucking scum. To give all those false details to the public before a trial he was up shit creek without a paddle from the start. And Kratz saying it would have been easier to just kill him?!! Seriously how does that even cross someone's mind.

While I don't think it's impossible that he and Brendan did do it, there's just too much skulduggery on the part of the police and prosecutor for me to think they were responsible. Not only that, it seems too much of a stretch that he can be completely exonerated of one serious crime (the rape), yet coincidentally be responsible for another even more serious crime. The whole saga is nothing short of astonishing - as you say, giving out a load of details prior to the trial as to what they think happened surely prejudices the trial. I find it ridiculous that they do this in the States and it's deemed acceptable - surely you save all that for the trial itself?

As for Brendan Dassey's confession, for me it isn't worth the paper it is written on - it was coerced out of him without his attorney even being present. This is basically a special needs child with a very low IQ and it was utterly disgusting how they manipulated him. Kratz said he must be guilty because he confessed.....errr no, 2 words you prick - Stefan Kiszko.

There were other people that were worthy suspects and why the hell was she only reported missing about 3 days after she was last seen?
 
I'm struggling to think he did it, however I suppose the sticking point would be, if he didn't do it, who did? And why would they want to frame him? Obviously answer if it was the local law enforcement but surely they wouldn't stoop so low as to to murder an innocent woman in the name of framing someone who had pissed them off??
 
CAN'T DO SPOILER THING ON MY PHONE - NEXT PARAGRAPH IS FULL OF THEM


No way did he do it in my opinion. Think the police could have done more to look at the ex boyfriend (all that voicemail stuff?) or Bobby Dassey and the other uncle/step dad (false alibis etc. seemed desperate to blame Steven and Brendan). Either way those police officers and in particular Kratz and Lent are pure fucking scum. To give all those false details to the public before a trial he was up shit creek without a paddle from the start. And Kratz saying it would have been easier to just kill him?!! Seriously how does that even cross someone's mind.

All the evidence (if you can call it that) was clearly fixed and should have, in essentially every part of the detail, exonerated him. Quite how the state even got it to court is just perplexing. I can only imagine that there were many threats and a lot of money involved in making it happen.

My opinion of him killing her is just a personal one. They're not the most regular family you would ever come across and certainly not whiter than white, and whilst that doesn't make him a murderer there is a part of me that believes he was either responsible or had some involvement somewhere/knew what happened.
 
I'm surprised how the police never thought to look at any of Teresa's family or social circle. They went for one suspect, Steven, which was mentioned when the truck was rang in by a searcher, straight from the off.

Her brother seemed a weird one. Cold, the poster face for her campaign for justice and oddly close to it all.
 
I'm struggling to think he did it, however I suppose the sticking point would be, if he didn't do it, who did? And why would they want to frame him? Obviously answer if it was the local law enforcement but surely they wouldn't stoop so low as to to murder an innocent woman in the name of framing someone who had pissed them off??

This world nothing surprises you.
It could have been the brother in law he looked shifty and was to quick to throw the boot in. Him or the other son didn't only seem each other.

But I still think it's the cops the two one with balding head and the one with black hair both with glasses.

Ken Kratz is one sly fecker as well. Don't think he was involved in the murder but knows stuff.
 
I'm surprised how the police never thought to look at any of Teresa's family or social circle. They went for one suspect, Steven, which was mentioned when the truck was rang in by a searcher, straight from the off.

Her brother seemed a weird one. Cold, the poster face for her campaign for justice and oddly close to it all.

Forgot to mention her brother. Don't get me wrong, it could be that he just wanted someone to go down for his sister's murder and that is perfectly understandable but he came across as someone that had this pre-conceived idea that Avery and Dassey were definitely guilty from the off, forever praising the prosecution and whatnot.

Is it just me but how come pretty much everyone associated with the prosecution case come across as either a right shifty twat or totally incompetent yet Avery's defence team behaved in a far more dignified and professional manner?
 
Forgot to mention her brother. Don't get me wrong, it could be that he just wanted someone to go down for his sister's murder and that is perfectly understandable but he came across as someone that had this pre-conceived idea that Avery and Dassey were definitely guilty from the off, forever praising the prosecution and whatnot.

Is it just me but how come pretty much everyone associated with the prosecution case come across as either a right shifty twat or totally incompetent yet Avery's defence team behaved in a far more dignified and professional manner?

Quite simply because most of them were bent coppers
 
I'm struggling to think he did it, however I suppose the sticking point would be, if he didn't do it, who did? And why would they want to frame him? Obviously answer if it was the local law enforcement but surely they wouldn't stoop so low as to to murder an innocent woman in the name of framing someone who had pissed them off??
It doesn't matter who did it. The prosecution's job was to prove beyond reasonable doubt that HE did it and they got nowhere near close to doing so.

Perhaps the strangest thing about this case is that two people are now doing time for the same murder when the prosecution presented two different versions of what they think happened.

They knew Brendan's testimony was too unreliable to use in Avery's case but they still used it to stitch him up in his own trial anyway. It blows my mind that they got away with it.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.