gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Anyone who owns one of these is selfish, stupid and utterly irresponsible.
She should get the son-in-law put down, not the dogs.She should get all three put down before they kill anyone.
All 4 would be my recommendation.She should get the son-in-law put down, not the dogs.
This is the main thing with them - you can't control the thing if it goes. There will be other dogs who kick off at them out of fear, I know my collie has growled a one round my way, keep her well away now even though the XL has a muzzle - never know how well it's attachedI have enough trouble keeping my whippet in check. Don’t understand why anybody would own a pet that they couldn’t physically beat in a fight if they had to.
That's quite a harsh take, but it is a fair one.Ask some of those on the sinking yacht thread.
In this case, if anyone is stupid enough to get a killer dog as a pet then they deserve a Darwin Award if it turns on them, and we can be thankful it didn’t kill a passer by.
Plus she's never 23.The dog was put down and 3 more dog were taken away. Thats at least 4 "restricted breeds" living in their house. I'm sorry but the phrase play stupid games etc comes to mind.
What sort of **** gives three of those fucking dogs to anyone, let alone a Woman on her own ffs ?
Son-in-law obviously hoping the dogs turn on her & they get an inheritance payout
That's quite a harsh take, but it is a fair one.
These dogs do have a significantly higher tendency to attack people and they certainly have the ability to kill a person as we all know. I just don't understand the logic of someone wanting one. And that's me saying that as a dog owner Springer Spaniels in our case.
I don't know, but it wouldn't surprise me if they did.Don't these dogs also quite willingly kill other dogs who are not as aggressive?