Manchester City Millions Ruin Football

[Hamann Pineapple]

So are you saying that City would be challenging for honours now without oil money?

No, saying Liverpool wouldn't have been where they were without the Moores.

 

[The Flash]

But this isn't about Liverpool's money. Man City were a nothing club before oil money was injected into it.

Liverpool have the history and tradition, they are one of the biggest clubs in the world and didn't need oil money to establish this. We were winning European Cups when there wasn't a lot of money in football.

And it doesn't matter what argument you put out - every other football person in the world will see City's achievements because of the oil money. Exactly the same with Chelsea in the past.

So, the £100m+ spent by Klu Klux Kenny was in no way to enable Liverpool to challenge for the league title?

You're either deluded or on drugs. Probably both.

Now you concentrate on cooking those rats for your kids' tea.

Silly, silly dipper.

 

[inchy14]

So are you saying that City would be challenging for honours now without oil money?

No nobody can, you're surely on a wind up with this.

Oh and spending money doesn't guarantee success as your lot are proving.

 

[Happy Feet]

So are you saying that City would be challenging for honours now without oil money?

Doubt it, any way you go and listen to a bit of Phil Colloins.

 

[Stevie G]

So are you saying that City would be challenging for honours now without oil money?

No nobody can, you're surely on a wind up with this.

Oh and spending money doesn't guarantee success as your lot are proving.

I'm not on a wind up. I've read Blue Moon for a few years and City are slowly turning into everything you hated about Man Utd i.e. getting out of town supporters, spending big money on players etc. I remember seeing lots of posts here about Chelsea and that they were "plastic" and that they were nothing before money.

Now you lot have money, your tune has changed overnight it seems. And Liverpool have spent wiseley, we're work in progress and will come good.

-- Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:15 pm --

So are you saying that City would be challenging for honours now without oil money?

Doubt it, any way you go and listen to a bit of Phil Colloins.

Who is Phil Colloins? Was he in Genesos?

 

[inchy14]

So are you saying that City would be challenging for honours now without oil money?

No nobody can, you're surely on a wind up with this.

Oh and spending money doesn't guarantee success as your lot are proving.

I'm not on a wind up. I've read Blue Moon for a few years and City are slowly turning into everything you hated about Man Utd i.e. getting out of town supporters, spending big money on players etc. I remember seeing lots of posts here about Chelsea and that they were "plastic" and that they were nothing before money.

Now you lot have money, your tune has changed overnight it seems. And Liverpool have spent wiseley, we're work in progress and will come good.-- Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:15 pm --

So are you saying that City would be challenging for honours now without oil money?

Doubt it, any way you go and listen to a bit of Phil Colloins.

Who is Phil Colloins? Was he in Genesos?

Now i know you're deluded, which of KKK's buys will come good?

Suarez less goals than aguero in a longer period.
Downing, no assists or goals in the prem.
Carroll?
Adam, slow dirty bastard.

You're clutching at straws mate, your messiah has come back without a clue about the modern game and you'll be lucky to finish in the top 6

 

[Happy Feet]

So are you saying that City would be challenging for honours now without oil money?

No nobody can, you're surely on a wind up with this.

Oh and spending money doesn't guarantee success as your lot are proving.

I'm not on a wind up. I've read Blue Moon for a few years and City are slowly turning into everything you hated about Man Utd i.e. getting out of town supporters, spending big money on players etc. I remember seeing lots of posts here about Chelsea and that they were "plastic" and that they were nothing before money.

Now you lot have money, your tune has changed overnight it seems. And Liverpool have spent wiseley, we're work in progress and will come good.

-- Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:15 pm --

So are you saying that City would be challenging for honours now without oil money?

Doubt it, any way you go and listen to a bit of Phil Colloins.

Who is Phil Colloins? Was he in Genesos?

He is the talented twin!!!!!!!!

 

[The Flash]

No nobody can, you're surely on a wind up with this.

Oh and spending money doesn't guarantee success as your lot are proving.

I'm not on a wind up. I've read Blue Moon for a few years and City are slowly turning into everything you hated about Man Utd i.e. getting out of town supporters, spending big money on players etc. I remember seeing lots of posts here about Chelsea and that they were "plastic" and that they were nothing before money.

Now you lot have money, your tune has changed overnight it seems. And Liverpool have spent wiseley, we're work in progress and will come good.-- Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:15 pm --

Doubt it, any way you go and listen to a bit of Phil Colloins.

Who is Phil Colloins? Was he in Genesos?

Now i know you're deluded, which of KKK's buys will come good?

Suarez less goals than aguero in a longer period.
Downing, no assists or goals in the prem.
Carroll?
Adam, slow dirty bastard.

You're cluthing at straws mate, your messiah has come back without a clue about the modern game and you'll be lucky to finish in the top 6

Liverpool have spent wisely? No, Liverpool have simply spent.

On garbage.

 

[MCFC BOB]

To be fair to the writer, money is ruining football.

"But this isn't about Liverpool's money."

A grand total of £97m between the lot of them.

Get fucked.

 

[inchy14]

fucking forgot about Henderson, he's worse than some of the others i've mentioned.