I read this article and came to the conclusion that this guy is motivated by anti Manchester City bias.
It's hidden in there, he's surely a fucking rag or a scouse cult follower trying his best to paint a nasty sordid picture of the Abu Dhabi group.
Manchester Council had swathes of derelict shitholes on the outskirts of the city due mainly to 90% of manufacturing going to China and Asia.
What can a council do with these huge area's of land/derelict buildings?
Then some mega rich Arabs come knocking wanting to transform these area's into something pleasant where people want to live, they offer a price where they can make some eventual profit (otherwise why would they bother)......what do you do ? Isnt profit why developers develop ? and why I imagine, hundreds if not thousands of new jobs are created.
It makes sense for all concerned to go with it. And be thankfull they didn't choose Detroit or some other city that used to manufacture and is still full of old slums.
It more than likely kept ratepayers bills down by a lot and solved a huge problem.
The journalist is nothing more than a biased a'hole attempting to turn public opinion against ADG.
A shining example of pathetic and biased media once again.