ANY1aBLUE said:de niro said:I'm no cynic said:In or Out?
Just be very careful of what you wish for.
Incredible as it may seem to some who post on here, we had similar arguments over Joe versus Big Mal. Basically, there was a boardroom power struggle and at the same time, Juventus were after Mal as their new manager. Mal said he'd stay ONLY if he became City's manager in place of Joe, and the incoming Peter Swales duly obliged by sidelining Joe into a position whereby he had no option but to quit City. The fans were divided, some of whom could be classed as 'outers' wanting a flamboyant manager of the Mourinho mould to have sole command, whereas the 'inners' wanted the safe and steady Joe to remain in the hope that if Mal did go, Joe would find another able assistant.
Anyway, Mal won, Joe went, and although the club managed to hold firm for a few more years, albeit with a steady turnover of managers, it was never again the same and many of us felt we were being robbed of potential greatness, which proved to be from the 1980s onwards.
Now that I've said my bit, class me as an 'Inner' based on our history, and I'll leave this thread for others to do the arguing.
bang on the money that man.
Why? Its a ridiculous argument.................utter nonsense. May as well be asking if they had similar star signs! Im not going to bother going over yet again why I dont want Mancini - but IF we keep him - lets see whose right in a years time. Even with another 200m spent I dont believe Mancini will get us the success in CL that the owners will require for his 500m spend.
If you really believe City will spend £200 million in the summer then you have not been following FFP and what MCFC are doing to comply.