Mancini Breaking News Part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lancet Fluke said:
pominoz said:
Esteban de la Sexface said:
An organisation that didn't go and get the manager of the 2011/2012 premier league champions the players he identified to kick the club on to compete on two fronts.

An organisation that let him be dismantled by journos the night of an F.A cup final loss.

An organisation that will replace him with a dour tactician who hasn't won a trophy in a decade.

A manager that had the number of Sir Alex Ferguson. Who won the league ahead of the schedule set out for him by the very same organisation.

Put opinions on the manager aside, is everyone at least in agreement that this fucking stinks?


Again it begs the question, why would they do that if everything is rosey in the garden?
Save your bile until the facts come out.

The facts will probably never come out and even if they did, those who have canonised Mancini would just refuse to believe them anyway.

does this work in reverse? I'll believe the facts. Facts are irrefutable.
If Mancini is proved right it is probably more devastating for the club. Either way it is destabalizing.

Not a fact, my opinion, the club are f*cking this up and it does not look good.
 
karen7 said:
what the hell are the club waiting for?If they want to sack him do it,sort the contract stuff after(or is that naive of me?) put him and us out of his bloody misery.A year after winning the title they have hung him out to dry and humilated him at wembley,fuck off club and sort it out

rant over

contract stuff before sacking him

pay off will be legally sorted before he moves on as it would be madness not do it
 
Lancet Fluke said:
The facts will probably never come out and even if they did, those who have canonised Mancini would just refuse to believe them anyway.

I think that if Mancini doesn't handle this with dignity the facts might come out. If he starts attacking the club the club will sanction a few leaks or interviews which will put him back in his box.

This is what I want us to avoid: a messy sacking. I hope a deal is done, a payoff agreed and everyone agrees a formal or informal non-disclosure.

I can't see how any party will gain from a war of words.
 
Cheadle Blue said:
check twtter out, a single city fan staging a protest outside the ground with a banner...my god as if this couldn't get any more embarrassing


Saw that. Honestly, do some twats not think before they act on this stuff?
 
karen7 said:
what the hell are the club waiting for?If they want to sack him do it,sort the contract stuff after(or is that naive of me?) put him and us out of his bloody misery.A year after winning the title they have hung him out to dry and humilated him at wembley,fuck off club and sort it out

rant over

Even City couldn't sack the manager a year ago to the day he won the league, could they?
 
Didsbury Dave said:
teddykgb said:
I just don't see what the club were supposed to do. "hey, roberto, we're going to fire you in a week and a half, but please do a good job coaching until then."

It's unreasonable. The plan all along was probably to wait until the end of the season and have a "process" whereby they'd fire him. Maybe before NY trip just to spare him that farce. The news got out early and the club should be concerned about the manner of that happening, but once it got out they can't really back him and then fire him in a week. They can't realistically pre-announce his firing. Yeah, it got ugly, but it realistically got ugly the second the news picked up steam, at that point there was realistically no way to put the cat back in the bag, so to speak.

You've got it bang on mate.

There is nothing the club could do differently about this. It's just moral high grounding and blame gaming which diverts from the key fact.

The hierarchy have decided that Mancini isn't the man for the club. A brave and, I believe, correct decision.

I personally like what Mancinin has brought during his tenure but I accept now that he may have forced himself out on a number of levels. I think his card may have been marked pre-season tbh.I do think they, the club, could have had a meeting with Pellegrini's agent in a less public place, kept things under wraps better and worked harder to allow him to leave in a less shitty way than this, if he is to go now.
I don't think it reflects well on us as a club and I think there will be a significant amount of negative press resulting. It leaves me with a bad taste, soley for the reason that he brought us out of the wilderness and gave us never to be forgotten memories. That in itself means he should be treated with a little more respect in my book.
 
samharris said:
pominoz said:
Esteban de la Sexface said:
An organisation that didn't go and get the manager of the 2011/2012 premier league champions the players he identified to kick the club on to compete on two fronts.

An organisation that let him be dismantled by journos the night of an F.A cup final loss.

An organisation that will replace him with a dour tactician who hasn't won a trophy in a decade.

A manager that had the number of Sir Alex Ferguson. Who won the league ahead of the schedule set out for him by the very same organisation.

Put opinions on the manager aside, is everyone at least in agreement that this fucking stinks?


Again it begs the question, why would they do that if everything is rosey in the garden?
Save your bile until the facts come out.

Bile ??

May have been the wrong word to use in response EDLS, but some on here are getting hysterical.
I have read posts that the owner is a "soulless ****" and that posters are done with City if Mancini goes.
Get a fucking grip everyone, and wait till we know what has been going on.
 
nickson71 said:
karen7 said:
what the hell are the club waiting for?If they want to sack him do it,sort the contract stuff after(or is that naive of me?) put him and us out of his bloody misery.A year after winning the title they have hung him out to dry and humilated him at wembley,fuck off club and sort it out

rant over

contract stuff before sacking him

pay off will be legally sorted before he moves on as it would be madness not do it


thanks,ive calmed down now,for now at least!:)
 
Even Inter Milan fans think he is slightly overrated. And he won them more trophies than he did for City. His CV certainly did benefit from the Calciopoli scandal. He is rated way too high by some here. While Pellegrini is being unfairly undermined.
 
Lets be Brutally honest. Mancini has been hung out to dry by the two Amigos.
My guess is he probably wishes he's left last summer.

MCFC - Back in Toy Town!
 
taconinja said:
I don't care if they like him or not. This is unfair to your supporters at this point, and the owners have an obligation to the people they want money from. I'm not being unreasonable either and suggesting anything crazy like they should consult fans about hiring a manager or something nonsensical. They do however have an obligation to act professionally and not make decisions based on petty vendettas.

And if that's not the case and people are coming to incorrect conclusions, it's the club's own damn fault for sitting their silently.

Yes, City should've spoken to Mancini on Saturday morning, or even Friday night when Khaldoun was with the team and manager. However City cannot control whats written in the Spanish media. That media wrote in February we'd agreed a deal with Pellegrini and we didn't address it then. Why would we suddenly address the exact same story a few months later. We had set the precedent. The fact that is roundly ignored is that the press have asked Mancini several times in the last few months "have you spoken to Khaldoun about your future" - and every single time he's answered "no I don't have to - why should I i have a 5 year contract". Well you should because you're getting arsey about people asking you about the speculation and the only person who can put it to bed privately at least is the chairman.

Mancini knew he was going. Has known for a while. But he's chosen to play dumb. That's his business, but beyond the 24 hour FA Cup period where I believe City should've told him he was done at the end of the season, they haven't done much else wrong in the last four or five months.

I feel like history is being rewritten slightly because a fans favourite has been sacked.
 
Lancet Fluke said:
pominoz said:
Esteban de la Sexface said:
An organisation that didn't go and get the manager of the 2011/2012 premier league champions the players he identified to kick the club on to compete on two fronts.

An organisation that let him be dismantled by journos the night of an F.A cup final loss.

An organisation that will replace him with a dour tactician who hasn't won a trophy in a decade.

A manager that had the number of Sir Alex Ferguson. Who won the league ahead of the schedule set out for him by the very same organisation.

Put opinions on the manager aside, is everyone at least in agreement that this fucking stinks?


Again it begs the question, why would they do that if everything is rosey in the garden?
Save your bile until the facts come out.

The facts will probably never come out and even if they did, those who have canonised Mancini would just refuse to believe them anyway.

He may well deserve the sack (personally I'd have given him another year but unlike some I'm not privy to what goes on behind the scenes ;) ) The way this has been handled doesn't reflect well on anyone though. It's exactly the same as the Hughes debacle and there were plenty of people sympathetic to him for being put in that situation and he was shite.

This situation is reflecting horribly on our club, making the directors seem amateur and it's not fair on the man who brought us our first silverware since well before I was born. If, as has been suggested in this thread, he's being hung out to dry because he's pissed some people off then those people want the sack for putting personal differences ahead of the image of the club.
 
Mancini knows what's going on. Only a deluded idiot can't put the pieces together.

After his last press conference, the club hierarchy are probably wondering why they didn't just boot him a few hours after the final. They didn't want to pull a Roman. Unfortunately that's the way sackings are handled for a reason.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
Lancet Fluke said:
The facts will probably never come out and even if they did, those who have canonised Mancini would just refuse to believe them anyway.

I think that if Mancini doesn't handle this with dignity the facts might come out. If he starts attacking the club the club will sanction a few leaks or interviews which will put him back in his box.

This is what I want us to avoid: a messy sacking. I hope a deal is done, a payoff agreed and everyone agrees a formal or informal non-disclosure.

I can't see how any party will gain from a war of words.

It will be done in peace.

Mancini and his camp are not stupid, they'll go as far as they could, they know it's not recommended to go over the line.
 
MSP said:
Cheadle Blue said:
check twtter out, a single city fan staging a protest outside the ground with a banner...my god as if this couldn't get any more embarrassing

Pam to join him as we speak :)

thanks to social media, i have already had 3 emaisl and 2 texts about it from rags, thanks alot you fucking bell end whoever you are
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top