Mancini Breaking News

[Balti]

the PR team are the ones who want sacking

useless

 

[citysince88]

What exactly has Mancini said that is wrong in that transcript?

He is %100 Correct, which is the worry.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

So why the fuck did they give him 5!! 5 fucking years! Then in the same breath not back him in the transfer market last summer. I didn't think he'd be here for 5 years but seems pretty strange the decision to fuck him off was made months ago.

Not aimed at you btw.

I'm struggling to understand this, particularly as I'm under the distinct impression that they didn't see him as the long-term replacement for Hughes from day 1 allegedly.

But having come in and won us the league playing, for some of the season, the most scintillating football for many years, perhaps they thought he was the right man after all. Then, having got a 5-year contract under his belt, he thought he was indestructible and he could afford to piss the new CEO and DOF off big time. MEN even reporting that he barely speaks to Vicky Kloss, as he blames her for the press he gets. According to him, no one else but him does their job well at City.

The more I hear about him the more I think he's one of those arrogant twats who think everyone but them is out of synch and not good enough to work with him. I don't respect people like that and I'll be glad to see the back of him.

So if you worked for a firm and they never backed you up... and then the guy in charge OF BUYING IN THE NEW WHATEVER.. UPDATES ETC fucked things up that YOUR job hung on you would be happy?? DONT THINK SO!

the firm fucked up here.. in every way! as for Calling him a TWAT.. FUCK OFF!

I am becoming increasingly aroused by your posts.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

From Oliver Kay (Times):

"All season long"

So their initial reservations and discussions where based on what?

A piss poor CL campaign maybe?

But when Mancini was appointed everybody was aware of his forays into the CL. He hadn't taken a decent Inter side into the latter stages, and Mourinho did. Why appoint then if there was a question mark over him? I think the CL is the excuse they are hanging the sacking on! If they sack Mancini because of a poor CL, they backed the wrong horse in the first place and they are culpable.

And I don't rate the last two years in the CL as an unmitigated disaster. We would have qualified the first season had we been in a few other groups, and last season we were stitched up by the shitehawks at Uefa, and but for a couple of inexplicable seconds at the Bernabeu we would have done the might Real. Defeat on that day cannot be laid at Mancini's door!

 

[kaz7]

He is perfectly within his rights to say what he has said,he has been hung out to dry many times by vicky and co none more so than yesterday,he has no protection from the media and has had to endure the media sniping from day one.for sure he is not walking out on us it is the sack or nothing

 

[the goats backside]

I thought we were supposed to stop thinking typical City, even with highly paid people things have not changed

 

[bluemoon32]

The way this is being handled one could be forgiven for thinking Swales was still in charge lol

 

[sam-caddick]

i adore mancini even more for this:

You’re still popular with the fans, do you think that will help you keep your job?

This is normal because we won. I don’t think there will ever be another manager who will win 6-1 at Old Trafford against Ferguson. I was the first manager who, after 30 years, took the banner from Old Trafford. We won one Premier League, we won one FA Cup, one Charity Shield. For this reason, I am very popular with the supporters. I love them, they love me. I am very happy for this. If I leave the club, I will be the first supporter of Manchester City in the future. Now, I can say nothing. I don’t know whether it’s true or not.

 

[Balti]

"All season long"

So their initial reservations and discussions where based on what?

A piss poor CL campaign maybe?

But when Mancini was appointed everybody was aware of his forays into the CL. He hadn't taken a decent Inter side into the latter stages, and Mourinho did. Why appoint then if there was a question mark over him? I think the CL is the excuse they are hanging the sacking on! If they sack Mancini because of a poor CL, they backed the wrong horse in the first place and they are culpable.

whereas pellegrini has already won the inter toto cup

it's all he has won in europe like

but still it's better than nowt

 

[City Raider]

has he inferred that it's suited kloss and the club to have him slated in the press as they want him out