Mancini Breaking News

Status
Not open for further replies.
dref619 said:
mancini clearly a dead man walking. everyones reporting that pelligrinis the man .. but is he ? smoke screen for mourinho anyone ?

Fans always talk about 'smokescreens' like people in football are masters of deception.

There has never been a smokescreen in football where a deliberate lie is told and then from no where the club pulls an old switcharoo!!

Smokescreens seem to only exist in the minds of fans on football forums.
 
MCFCBen said:
citysince88 said:
pudge said:
What exactly has Mancini said that is wrong in that transcript?

He is %100 Correct, which is the worry.

Whetherhe us correct or not, you can't say things like that about your colleagues and not be punished for it.

He was ambushed. What choice did he have?

That Kloss woman should have controlled the interview. The fact that she allowed him to be grilled like while she was in the room speaks volumes.

and oh surprise surprise it appears that she's Marwood's toady

if she'd have done her job properly than he'd never been asked those questions in the first place
 
MCFC BOB said:
We sacked Hughes for a manager that, at the time, had no Premier League experience and didn't know a thing about English football. He will leave us with three titles and an improved CV.

Will we sack him for another manager that, at this time, has no Premier League experience and doesn't know a thing about English football? Let's see what happens, shall we? After all, that is all we can do.

And a manager that has never won anything in his career and is 59 years old. Yeah, can't wait
 
In--Out..In...Out, the Sheikh will sort it out,

We Get rid of Mancini, and we turn it round,

That's what it's all about,!!!

Ohh oooh ooh Typical City

Ohh oooh ooh Typical City

Ohh oooh ooh Typical City

Knees Jerk, Kloss Next, Then Ya Ya!!


I'll Get me coat.....
 
Blue Haze said:
Were the players you signed last summer your players or did someone buy them for you?

We did a market in the last week. We didn’t have any other players. We chose these players because we didn’t move very quickly last year. We moved in the last week of August. We didn’t have these players in pre-season.

Did you sign those players because they were the only ones left?

The players that we took, I decided to take these players. But you need to move in February, March, April, May. August is difficult because you don’t have these players in pre-season.

Would love to know what Jack is thinking reading about this. We bought these players because it was the last week. Alright, that may be true, but ffs don't say it publicly.
Rodwell was signed earlier mate and I think it's quite clear that Mancini thinks highly of him
 
Berkovic_blue said:
MCFC BOB said:
We sacked Hughes for a manager that, at the time, had no Premier League experience and didn't know a thing about English football. He will leave us with three titles and an improved CV.

Will we sack him for another manager that, at this time, has no Premier League experience and doesn't know a thing about English football? Let's see what happens, shall we? After all, that is all we can do.

And a manager that has never won anything in his career and is 59 years old. Yeah, can't wait

Well, at least we know there will be fans quick to post Pellegrini Out threads!
 
AdamManCity said:
Blue Haze said:
Were the players you signed last summer your players or did someone buy them for you?

We did a market in the last week. We didn’t have any other players. We chose these players because we didn’t move very quickly last year. We moved in the last week of August. We didn’t have these players in pre-season.

Did you sign those players because they were the only ones left?

The players that we took, I decided to take these players. But you need to move in February, March, April, May. August is difficult because you don’t have these players in pre-season.

Would love to know what Jack is thinking reading about this. We bought these players because it was the last week. Alright, that may be true, but ffs don't say it publicly.
Rodwell was signed earlier mate and I think it's quite clear that Mancini thinks highly of him

Spot on. I think Jack has a bright future with us, like what I;ve seen in the 2nd half of the season.
 
argyle said:
Berkovic_blue said:
MCFC BOB said:
We sacked Hughes for a manager that, at the time, had no Premier League experience and didn't know a thing about English football. He will leave us with three titles and an improved CV.

Will we sack him for another manager that, at this time, has no Premier League experience and doesn't know a thing about English football? Let's see what happens, shall we? After all, that is all we can do.

And a manager that has never won anything in his career and is 59 years old. Yeah, can't wait

Well, at least we know there will be fans quick to post Pellegrini Out threads!
That's the way it goes. As stated, if the club wanted a smooth, clean transition they cocked it up big time.
 
FantasyIreland said:
LoveCity said:
Fook me, Mancini's man management skills have always been in question but you don't piss off the Sheikh... his word is that of God at this club.

His arrogance and self importance knows no bounds.It's a main reason he will never be great.

In 12 months time people will realise just how limited he was.

He seriously had idea that he might become as powerful at City as Ferguson was at United, he was talking in these lines in few interviews..

You really have to have some weird reality perception if you think you can get that nowadays..
 
MSP said:
M9 Blue said:
MSP said:
How about finalizing all paper and money things for both in and out stuff before doing that...

Some of people here are dumb as fuck... it's not City who leaked anything out, it was found out by media and it went public before City were ready for that. When things are finished, it will be announced. I doubt they give a flying one about people moaning on Bluemoon and they are bloody right in that.
I may be dumb as f*** and i never said City leaked anything,but we can't go into Tuesdays game like this.

So fooking what?

What should they do if Pellegrini signing is not completed and Mancini settlement not arranged. Go public just to satisfy Mancini's leverboys here and then one of those two to fail and to stay in the middle of nothing.

Yeah, sure..
If Mancini is going,are we really going to make him squirm on the touchline at Reading,picking a team when all the players know he is toast. Ffs pay the man off and lets move on.
 
There seems to be a lot of "getting away from the issue" here

Forget the "fall out" in the press room,who should or shouldn't have defended him,he is going for footballing reasons only,we have won fuck all,and managers pay the price,that's the top and bottom of it.......that's football
 
Balti said:
MCFCBen said:
citysince88 said:
He is %100 Correct, which is the worry.

Whetherhe us correct or not, you can't say things like that about your colleagues and not be punished for it.

He was ambushed. What choice did he have?

That Kloss woman should have controlled the interview. The fact that she allowed him to be grilled like while she was in the room speaks volumes.

and oh surprise surprise it appears that she's Marwood's toady

if she'd have done her job properly than he'd never been asked those questions in the first place

I take your point and her position should be looked at, but he is a manager. He is paid to manage situations. This means that he cannot always say what he is thinking. He may have said it as he knows he is a gonner; however, the club could look at breach of contract for some of those comments!
 
argyle said:
Berkovic_blue said:
MCFC BOB said:
We sacked Hughes for a manager that, at the time, had no Premier League experience and didn't know a thing about English football. He will leave us with three titles and an improved CV.

Will we sack him for another manager that, at this time, has no Premier League experience and doesn't know a thing about English football? Let's see what happens, shall we? After all, that is all we can do.

And a manager that has never won anything in his career and is 59 years old. Yeah, can't wait

Well, at least we know there will be fans quick to post Pellegrini Out threads!
I think Didsbury Dave has already started one.
 
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2323509/Manuel-Pellegrini-replacing-Roberto-Mancini--British-manager-MARTIN-SAMUEL.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... AMUEL.html</a>

Best football writer in the business hits the nail on head again,especially on the second topic regarding the disgusting Financial "Fair" play rules
 
M9 Blue said:
MSP said:
M9 Blue said:
I may be dumb as f*** and i never said City leaked anything,but we can't go into Tuesdays game like this.

So fooking what?

What should they do if Pellegrini signing is not completed and Mancini settlement not arranged. Go public just to satisfy Mancini's leverboys here and then one of those two to fail and to stay in the middle of nothing.

Yeah, sure..
If Mancini is going,are we really going to make him squirm on the touchline at Reading,picking a team when all the players know he is toast. Ffs pay the man off and lets move on.
One would think MSP had never heard of a caretaker manager before.
 
ayrshire_blue said:
Breaking:

Tancredi Palmeri has just tweeted that an interview with a famous journalist who is also mancinis closest friend in business has revealed that its NOT Txiki or Soriano who have pushed for his exit but SHEIKH MANSOUR after an unexpected breakdown in relationship.

Can see that having some credibility purely based on Mancini's character. He has constantly pushed for more authority and probably made a play against Ferran & Txiki as he did against Cook and Marwood if I recall. Its the same with characters like Mancini or a Mourinho or Benitez that they can't help pushing against restrictions and agitating for more of this and greater say in matters. And whilst they are winning its fine but stop winning and people start to wonder why they put up with it.

The trouble with the Roberto's and Jose's and Rafa's is they are a first class pain in arse but its this constant drive that also makes them win trophies. Pellegrini everyone says is a lovely guy, a first rate coach and the players will probably love him but he just doesn't come across as having that implacable drive to win and to win all the time. Arguably in all three cases it wears out the players to the extent that every three years or so you are guaranteed for relationships to break down. Even Jose with his knack of getting the players on side the intensity of it all still gets them in the end causing it to fracture.

All three coaches also have this iron clad confidence in themselves that makes reasoning with them impossible. They are always right. Its the world that is wrong and they fight a constant war to shape the world to their view.

Anyway I'll stop rambling...
 
Lenblue said:
In--Out..In...Out, the Sheikh will sort it out,

.

Well, how things are going, someone will ask for sheikh to get the fook out, not to sort it out.

Kloss joined Marwood at public enemy list, Spanish guys are strong candidates to become members of that club. Next one is Khaldoon and then nobody is left by Sheikh himself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top