samharris said:
Depends on the individual tbh,
to me its what you do when you have love or passion for something...But most have differing views on how to portray it..I believe that we will be truly great one day so when i look back on how i behaved towards my team in the diffucult times then i will feel better that i was understanding and willing to persevere until it got better..
Many will say im wrong im sure..but like i said support is down to each and every individual to portray it in what way they like...
Most row and handbag session on here is due to this..
I suppose i would be classed as happy clapper by the supporters i would class as negative...and so it goes..
who the fuck is right.. cos there aint no in betweens..
There's a saying Dave...you can know everthing there is to know about something but the out come would still be the same if you knew nothing..
So what's the point in Bluemoon then Sam?
Seems to me that there's a fuck load of people advocating that Bluemoon be censored, or that we censor each others opinions based on some vague notion that it feeds the negative press agenda.
The fact is that the press will be negative come what may. We could have a board full of "Mancini is great" threads and it wouldn't change the tone of the press right now because our performances have given them that ammunition...not this board.
What's worse, and I'm not accusing you of this mate, are the
posters who start insinuating that by criticizing Mancini on Bluemoon you're not a real City supporter, or that you don't have the club's best interests at heart. Criticizing the manager is no different to criticizing a player, the ticket office, or the Balti pies...
The fact will always remain, that the owners will dispense with Mancini (just as they did with Hughes), when they see fit. It'll have nothing whatsoever to do with what we think.