Matty
Well-Known Member
davymcfc said:this is actually a very good post. i am pro mancini but that is accurate. what i will say is that is it a good idea to get rid of another manager? and also if mancini was in charge all season, according to the stats he would have got well over 70 points. the question is, was mancini given a reasonable target? and would hughes have made that 70 points?Matty said:The original statement was a simple one - Mancini has Failed.
Lets look at that, in it's simplest terms. Mancini was set two targets:-
1 - Finish in the Top 4
2 - Continue with "The trajectory" and hit the 70 point mark.
Now failure is a black and white area, getting close isn't good enough, you either achieve targets or you don't. It's entirely feasible we'll beat West Ham on Sunday and finish in 5th place, on 69 points. Both of these are very, VERY close to the targets set, however neither actually MEET the targets set. So, in short, the original statement was 100% accurate, Mancini has failed, on both counts. What the club does about it, and where people ultimately say the blame lies, are interesting, yet irrelevant, points. Mancini HAS failed, to argue otherwise is to simply ignore the facts.
In my opinion Champion's League qualification was lost during the run of 10 drawn league games. 10 points from a possible 30 is completely unacceptable, especially given some of the games we had during that period. We took 6 points from Chelsea, 4 from Arsenal yet still missed out on the top 4, the reason is dropped points against relegation candidates, and thrown away leads in games we should have closed out. Mancini inherited issues, we'd already dropped a lot of points so he had far less room to manouevre. Another issue was the completely ridiculous form Spurs hit, they've won 9 of their last 11 games, that's title challenging form, 27 points from 33 is ridiculous, it'll be years before Spurs come close to a run like that again.