Mancini IN ..

Re: Mancini wanted Van Pervert and the powers that be didnt

NipHolmes said:
Barry Conlons wig said:
Van pervert on his own this year as earnt the rags 31 league points, that is the difference... how can anyone blame Mancini!!!!!!!
Nothing to do with us having 4 strikers and Guidetti. Nothing to do with us paying a shedload in wages for him and also take a hit on fees when we sell a striker or two to make way?

RVP isn't the reason why our midfield is poor and why we play so narrow.

No RVP is the reason the rags are where they are.. plain and simple
 
Re: Mancini wanted Van Pervert and the powers that be didnt

Barry Conlons wig said:
NipHolmes said:
Barry Conlons wig said:
Van pervert on his own this year as earnt the rags 31 league points, that is the difference... how can anyone blame Mancini!!!!!!!
Nothing to do with us having 4 strikers and Guidetti. Nothing to do with us paying a shedload in wages for him and also take a hit on fees when we sell a striker or two to make way?

RVP isn't the reason why our midfield is poor and why we play so narrow.

No RVP is the reason the rags are where they are.. plain and simple
Had they not got RVP they'd have most likely got someone else. I hear this ' RVP scores this much and they'd be down without him' but thats discounting the player who'd have played instead of him, like Hernandez etc. They'd have paid when Rooney was out injured but they'd still be fighting. They did last year without their captain and RVP.

We underestimate them on this forum imho. I hate them but as a collective unit they're good. They have tried and tested wing play 4-4-2/4-4-1-1 as well as having a diamond (European) formation. They have all bases covered in fairness. I wrote them off last year and they've shocked me. I just hope Real smash them and they crumble in the league. We live on in hope.
 
Re: Mancini wanted Van Pervert and the powers that be didnt

NipHolmes said:
Barry Conlons wig said:
NipHolmes said:
Nothing to do with us having 4 strikers and Guidetti. Nothing to do with us paying a shedload in wages for him and also take a hit on fees when we sell a striker or two to make way?

RVP isn't the reason why our midfield is poor and why we play so narrow.

No RVP is the reason the rags are where they are.. plain and simple
Had they not got RVP they'd have most likely got someone else. I hear this ' RVP scores this much and they'd be down without him' but thats discounting the player who'd have played instead of him, like Hernandez etc. They'd have paid when Rooney was out injured but they'd still be fighting. They did last year without their captain and RVP.

We underestimate them on this forum imho. I hate them but as a collective unit they're good. They have tried and tested wing play 4-4-2/4-4-1-1 as well as having a diamond (European) formation. They have all bases covered in fairness. I wrote them off last year and they've shocked me. I just hope Real smash them and they crumble in the league. We live on in hope.
Correct. Plus it's good play by the team that creates the chances for him, he's not Messi! Had they not signed van Persie they would had signed someone else. Ibrahimovic was available, for example. If not him someone else. It was time United bought a top level striker and they would have bought one whomever it was.
 
Re: Mancini wanted Van Pervert and the powers that be didnt

Barry Conlons wig said:
Van pervert on his own this year as earnt the rags 31 league points, that is the difference... how can anyone blame Mancini!!!!!!!
What the fuck has that got to do with the fact that we're 10 points worse off than we were after 26 games last season? Or the fact that we are 6 points down in the equivalent games?

Do you honestly believe the rags would have been fighting it out in mid-table with the likes of Stoke and West Brom without RVP?
 
Re: Mancini wanted Van Pervert and the powers that be didnt

Prestwich_Blue said:
Barry Conlons wig said:
Van pervert on his own this year as earnt the rags 31 league points, that is the difference... how can anyone blame Mancini!!!!!!!
What the fuck has that got to do with the fact that we're 10 points worse off than we were after 26 games last season? Or the fact that we are 6 points down in the equivalent games?

Do you honestly believe the rags would have been fighting it out in mid-table with the likes of Stoke and West Brom without RVP?

This balloon probably does, yes.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.