hilts
Well-Known Member
It’s like Schumacher vs Senna. One is technically near perfect the other more about passion. Peps football is a thinking mans game like chess and the beauty can be admired with the right mindset but to some a lot of it can be quite boring. I found the fallings out and deficiencies under Mancini far more interesting. Barcelona under Pep was the same it could get pretty dull watching it after a while. A genius geek versus a passionate loon.
Plenty of money, great manager you kind of expect Pep to do very well almost a hiding to nothing really. The treble and 100 points get fuck all credit in the scheme of things. The Mancini era was far more interesting and being the time when we made it helps. Toure in his prime and annoying, Tevez and Balotelli was a blast in fairness. As others have posted Pep doesn’t really have much of a relationship with the fans.
Plenty of money, great manager you kind of expect Pep to do very well almost a hiding to nothing really. The treble and 100 points get fuck all credit in the scheme of things. The Mancini era was far more interesting and being the time when we made it helps. Toure in his prime and annoying, Tevez and Balotelli was a blast in fairness. As others have posted Pep doesn’t really have much of a relationship with the fans.