Mancini out (Merged)

[Freestyler]

Re: Mancini out

I'm Mancini in, have been since the day he arrived.

but he's starting to worry me now, very bizarre some of the things he's doing.

 

[sammyvine]

Re: Mancini out

I can't see Mourinho moving unless he is sacked. He wants to win the Spanish league and will need another season or two.

If they lose to Barca in the games next month, him coming to us will be a reality as Madrid will deffo sack him if they go out in the CL, and lose the cup final.

Owen Coyle would be an improvement on Mancini. Spalletti the ex Roma coach would be an improvement but I guess after Mancini we should go for a manager who is proven.

What do you mean by proven?

Mancini clearly wasn't proven, as he won the titles in a SHIT league with no competition. I think a manager who has worked in a better league or the PL would be best for us.

Mourinho is the best choice but Hiddink proved at his stint at Chelsea that he has what it takes to do well in the PL.

I think even Spalletti would be better than Mancini as he got Roma playing really good football.

Owen Coyle would be decent as well.

 

[sammyvine]

Who should City get to replace Mancini?

Honestly if he goes who could we get?

Mourinho is no certainty as he may stay at Madrid. If he gets sacked though if they lose against Barca in the big games, it may be a possibility.

I just want Mancini out, it is clear he is not right for the PL.

 

[adamkeyworth]

Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

there's already a mancini out thread, save it.

 

[DSonBlue]

Re: Mancini out

From a neutrals view, I'd say he's done a pretty poor job. To be 13 points behind a pretty poor player for player Man United side compared to other years is really bad given the money spent. Based on pure squads, I'd have City 1st, maybe 2nd to Chelsea, yet you might even struggle for a top 4 finish which should be the absolute bare minimum. He had half last season and a full pre-season and still can't get it going.

City are a club now that could attract just about any manager in the world, probably bar Ferguson/Wenger. Sticking with Mancini would be pretty daft when there are plenty of other managers out there who could do a lot better and play much better attacking football with the players you have at your disposal. It's actually quite frustrating, I love football, I love great football even more. City should be taking the game to likes of United/Arsenal etc...not looking to simply go there for a point and look to keep it tight. That's for the likes of Blackburn, Stoke, heck even us at the minute.

You should be challenging for the title, not trying to hold onto 4th place. Which is even worse because you don't play attacking football, pretty football at times but not aggressive.

Getting bored of saying this, but...

We're 4th in the league, the players have had less than a year to gel, and we were better than Utd at Old Trafford recently. We won 5 nil last week, playing some good stuff.

We've lost (admittedly playing poorly) at Anfield, where not long ago so did Utd (ableit playing slightly better than we did).

End of season is the time to judge - and be realistic when doing so (or stick to Champ Manager where you assemble a squad and get instant results...)

Impatient, vain kneejerkers are the worst kind of fan.

Stop listening to the press.

If creating a team to challenge the best were that easy, and since money is the main criteria, look at all the millions other clubs have "wasted" on players over the years.

It all takes time, which means patience, realistic expectations, and possibly most importantly, continuity.

 

[DD]

Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

I'd settle for Jimmy Frizzell, Frank Clark or Phil Neal instead of this prick!:)

 

[Andouble]

Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

Mourinho won't even return your call if you're in Europa league, and rightfully so.

 

[larderland]

Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

itd have to be sum1 with premier league experience imo,brining in a foregnier would prob end up the same as mancini

 

[JoeCity21]

Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

I'm a supporter of Mancini may I state firstly.

But in worst case scenario, I'd have Hiddink here.

Mourinho is just a bit too out of our league at the moment.

Plus he'd just win us a trophy, then go somewhere else to win another trophy etc.

 

[DD]

Re: Mancini out

From a neutrals view, I'd say he's done a pretty poor job. To be 13 points behind a pretty poor player for player Man United side compared to other years is really bad given the money spent. Based on pure squads, I'd have City 1st, maybe 2nd to Chelsea, yet you might even struggle for a top 4 finish which should be the absolute bare minimum. He had half last season and a full pre-season and still can't get it going.

City are a club now that could attract just about any manager in the world, probably bar Ferguson/Wenger. Sticking with Mancini would be pretty daft when there are plenty of other managers out there who could do a lot better and play much better attacking football with the players you have at your disposal. It's actually quite frustrating, I love football, I love great football even more. City should be taking the game to likes of United/Arsenal etc...not looking to simply go there for a point and look to keep it tight. That's for the likes of Blackburn, Stoke, heck even us at the minute.

You should be challenging for the title, not trying to hold onto 4th place. Which is even worse because you don't play attacking football, pretty football at times but not aggressive.

Getting bored of saying this, but...

We're 4th in the league, the players have had less than a year to gel, and we were better than Utd at Old Trafford recently. We won 5 nil last week, playing some good stuff.

We've lost (admittedly playing poorly) at Anfield, where not long ago so did Utd (ableit playing slightly better than we did).

End of season is the time to judge - and be realistic when doing so (or stick to Champ Manager where you assemble a squad and get instant results...)

Impatient, vain kneejerkers are the worst kind of fan.

Stop listening to the press.

If creating a team to challenge the best were that easy, and since money is the main criteria, look at all the millions other clubs have "wasted" on players over the years.

It all takes time, which means patience, realistic expectations, and possibly most importantly, continuity.

Spurs went from bottom to 4th in 18 months.

Fossils have formed quicker than we are gelling.

Wake up and smell the salt son. You sound like the wife who has been cheated on and knocked about a bit but who says "he's lovely really and he loves me you know".