Mancini out (Merged)

remoh said:
'Young and learning' was your expression. Put that together with 'proven manager' and you have a contradiction in terms. It's a desperate attempt at defending the indefensible.
What I can't understand is the reason why you and the others are taking Mancini's side, when you can see exactly what we see, an under-performing group of players. Inspiration comes from good managers.
I am not normally a 'manager out' type of fan; I never joined in the attack on Hughes, apart from criticisms of his defence, but Mancini's failure is screaming at us and I just hope that our owners, who are not stupid men, will take the appropriate action asap.
We all want stability, but that desire should not control our opinions.

You talk sense mate.

I have faith in The Sheikh's ability to see through this charlatan.
 
Blue Mooner said:
remoh said:
And this is the whole point, isn't it. Apart from the last paragraph, it sums up what so many of us think. (I don't think a win on saturday would turn an incompetent manager into a good one)
D D will keep on coming on here talking sense as long as he sees unbelievable tripe being spouted by Blues who support a manager who brings the worst out of good players.
Mancini should go now.

So how do you explain such a 'great' manager as Fergie taking his Man United team from 2nd to 11th then 13th ? Was Fergie bringing out the 'worst' out of good players or was he just in a transitional period of trying to build a championship winning side ?

If you think you can transform a team from perennial mediocrity into premiership winners in less than 18 months you are seriously deluded.

Spot on!!

Glad someone speaks sense on here they are few and far between!
 
dasblues said:
Didsbury Dave said:
Hang on, the "few disaffected players" line was trotted out last season, and he was allowed to get rid of some quality players. Same in Jan when he shed more.

And still a significant number of the first team, and I'll throw in the backroom staff, don't like or respect him.

He's the problem, not the players. He had his chance to purge them and get his own men in and onside. He's blown it.


So you suggest the very definition of insanity, repeating the the same thing and expecting a different result?

Getting a new man in will in no way guarantee us not to be in the same postion next year as this.

Remeber back to Hughes , we had the same problems with dissaffected players then. Players who didn't like his aloofness and squad discipline , Elano , Dunne etc

be careful what you wish for....

Isn't this just what you are doing by wanting Mancini to stay on? We'd get another season of poor performances from valuable players.
 
Re: Mancini out

levets said:
SWP's back said:
True colours come out at last.

I can't ever imagine saying I don't give a shit about the club, whoever the manger was and whatever the result.

You have every right to hold your opinion on the manager but to say you don't give a shit. Reminds me of that tosspot that used to play for us and said something similar when he was on the bench. Birds of a feather...

Birds of a feather...
============
And there you have it.... Listening to the ramblings of another deluded fuckwit to much.

Mummy, mummy! The little boys on the internet are calling me names! I think I'm going to cry.....

But seriously Levets, Swp's Back - as I said earlier - I really really couldn't give a toss whether you're offended by what I posted. You can take as many cheap shots as you like. Keep 'em coming. It just shows your own massive insecurities.
 
remoh said:
dasblues said:
So you suggest the very definition of insanity, repeating the the same thing and expecting a different result?

Getting a new man in will in no way guarantee us not to be in the same postion next year as this.

Remeber back to Hughes , we had the same problems with dissaffected players then. Players who didn't like his aloofness and squad discipline , Elano , Dunne etc

be careful what you wish for....

Isn't this just what you are doing by wanting Mancini to stay on? We'd get another season of poor performances from valuable players.

Surely giving a manager time is the exact opposite of what we have done before, or am I missing something?
 
must give him time,if he stays for 3 years some of these player will not be here,he will improve the squad each year,also the undercover rags on here will be loving all this sack the manger.
 
bri an t said:
must give him time,if he stays for 3 years some of these player will not be here,he will improve the squad each year,also the undercover rags on here will be loving all this sack the manger.
The rags will be gutted if we get rid of Mancini.
 
Bluemoon115 said:
The rags will be gutted if we get rid of Mancini.

Considering they know fuck all about football you might want to try a different tack.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.