"Mancini - Right or Wrong?"

[yerwot?]

not what i expected after the opening ssentences. At all.
Opinions backed by facts make excellent reading.
The die-hard outers will have trouble finding fault
In fact some inners will say you ignored the difficulties he is perceived to have faced.
Good stuff, write some more

 

[br62]

A balanced and fair article until the completely 'over the top' last line.

 

[Davs 19]

A good, well balanced read. Cheers mate !

 

[TGR]

Good article.
When compared to the one that Didsbury Dave wrote it is truly a literary masterpiece.
Thanks for taking the time write the article in which you showed your colours as an 'inner' (as I am) up front but still managed to be fair, balanced and objective.
DD - take note!

 

[stony]

Good read, a fair, well balanced and interesting article. Well done Jimbo.

 

[the blue panther]

Excellent article mate - well done.
(Bet you don't get 40 odd pages of comment though, unlike the self righteous drivel did yesterday from he who's name may never be utterred or written.)

 

[Lancet Fluke]

I enjoyed that. It was nearly as good as Didsbury Dave's.

 

[bumbleblue]

Well balanced and well written thanks

 

[Ray78]

A fair article.

 

[NorCalBlue]

Nice piece, although I'm sure there are many posters who'll be confused by the following;

"If I had to make a case for sacking Mancini based on this seasons performances I could easily do so.

If I had to make a case for keeping Mancini based on this seasons performances I could easily do so."

Funnily enough, I wrote a couple of short articles for MCIVTA not long before Hughes got sacked saying much the same about him. I think it's a good exercise for anyone with strong opinions to play devil's advocate once in a while - it's not good to spend all your time in an echo chamber hearing the same carefully chosen facts (and probably a lot of conjecture and plain lies) that support one viewpoint, over and over.